Skip to content
InfoDoc MicroVeille
Veille dédiée aux Sciences de l'Information et des Bibliothèques // Collecting and Sharing research papers in Library and Information science ISSN 2429-3938
  • À propos
  • About
  • Partager une publication

Étiquette : Peer Review

FR

Évaluation ouverte par les pairs : de l’expérimentation à la modélisation : Récit d’une expérience d’évaluation ouverte par les pairs

Posted on 18 mars 2016 by Hans Dillaerts

Cet article relate le déroulement de l’expérimentation d’un dispositif d’évaluation ouverte par les pairs et de commentaire ouvert, pour des p...

EN

Improving the peer-review process and editorial quality: key errors escaping the review and editorial process in top scientific journals

Posted on 9 février 2016 by Hans Dillaerts

We apply a novel mistake index to assess trends in the proportion of corrections published between 1993 and 2014 in Nature, Science and PNAS. The index revealed...

EN

Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals

Posted on 6 février 2016 by Hans Dillaerts

Background Recent controversies highlighting substandard peer review in Open Access (OA) and traditional (subscription) journals have increased the need for aut...

EN

The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review

Posted on 31 janvier 2016 by Hans Dillaerts

Openness is one of the central values of science. Open scientific practices such as sharing data, materials and analysis scripts alongside published articles ha...

EN

Peer review: The current landscape and future trends

Posted on 26 janvier 2016 by Hans Dillaerts

This paper is based on research commissioned by the Wellcome Trust in 2015 and catalogues current initiatives and trends in the systems and processes surroundin...

EN

Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: Does it make a difference?

Posted on 26 janvier 2016 by Hans Dillaerts

A megajournal is an open-access journal that publishes any manuscript that presents scientifically trustworthy empirical results, without asking about the poten...

EN

A new scholar’s perspective on open peer review

Posted on 19 novembre 2015 by Hans Dillaerts

This article argues that the pedagogical and scholarly benefits of open peer review far outweigh those of traditional double-blind peer review, but require a sh...

Pagination des publications

« Previous 1 … 19 20 21 … 25 Next »

Abonnement par mail

Email subscription

Vérifiez votre boite de réception ou votre répertoire d’indésirables pour confirmer votre abonnement. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

Étiquettes

academic libraries Altmetrics article-processing charges Bibliometrics biomedical research business models case study Citation analysis copyright COVID-19 data reuse data sharing European Union France gold open access green road HSS institutional repositories Libraries OER open access open access journals open access policies open access publishing open data openness open repositories open science Peer Review Preprint research data research data management research impact Scholarly Communication scholarly journals Scholarly Publishing scientific communication scientific data scientific practices scientific pratices self-archiving state of the art UK USA wikipedia

Méta

  • Connexion
  • Flux des publications
  • Flux des commentaires
  • Site de WordPress-FR

Autres sites

Travaux en Info-Doc

Rencontres et Echanges Pro

© 2025 InfoDoc MicroVeille
Powered by WordPress | Theme: Graphy by Themegraphy