Towards a (De)centralization-Based Typology of Peer Production
Online peer-production platforms facilitate the coordination of creative work and services. Generally considered as empowering participatory tools and a source ...
Étiquette : Peer Review
Évaluation ouverte par les pairs : de l’expérimentation à la modélisation : Récit d’une expérience d’évaluation ouverte par les pairs
Cet article relate le déroulement de l’expérimentation d’un dispositif d’évaluation ouverte par les pairs et de commentaire ouvert, pour des p...
Improving the peer-review process and editorial quality: key errors escaping the review and editorial process in top scientific journals
We apply a novel mistake index to assess trends in the proportion of corrections published between 1993 and 2014 in Nature, Science and PNAS. The index revealed...
Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals
Background Recent controversies highlighting substandard peer review in Open Access (OA) and traditional (subscription) journals have increased the need for aut...
The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review
Openness is one of the central values of science. Open scientific practices such as sharing data, materials and analysis scripts alongside published articles ha...
Peer review: The current landscape and future trends
This paper is based on research commissioned by the Wellcome Trust in 2015 and catalogues current initiatives and trends in the systems and processes surroundin...
Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: Does it make a difference?
A megajournal is an open-access journal that publishes any manuscript that presents scientifically trustworthy empirical results, without asking about the poten...