Who reviews for predatory journals? A study on reviewer characteristics
Authors : Anna Severin, Michaela Strinzel, Matthias Egger, Marc Domingo, Tiago Barros Background While the characteristics of scholars who publish in predatory ...
Étiquette : scientific communication
Open Access publishing practice in geochemistry: overview of current state and look to the future
Authors : Olivier Pourret, Andrew Hursthouse, Dasapta Erwin Irawan, Karen Johannesson, Haiyan Liu, Marc Poujol, Romain Tartèse, Eric D. van Hullebusch, Oliver W...
Prevalence of Potentially Predatory Publishing in Scopus on the Country Level
Authors : Tatiana Savina, Ivan Sterligov We present the results of a large-scale study of potentially predatory journals (PPJ) represented in the Scopus databas...
Publications numériques scientifiques universitaires internationales : Disruption, quels acteurs,quels projets ?
Auteur/Author : Appoline Romanens Les enseignants-chercheurs d’aujourd’hui se heurtent à des APC, ont besoin de logiciels de PAO, avec un DMP pour apparaître da...
Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations
Authors : Meredith T. Niles, Lesley A. Schimanski, Erin C. McKiernan, Juan Pablo Alperin Using an online survey of academics at 55 randomly selected institution...
Open Access+ Service: reframing library support to take research outputs to non-academic audiences
Author: Scott Taylor The University of Manchester Library has established a key role in facilitating scholarly discourse through its mediated open access (OA) s...
Demarcating Spectrums of Predatory Publishing: Economic and Institutional Sources of Academic Legitimacy
Author : Kyle Sile The emergence of Open Access (OA) publishing has altered incentives and opportunities for academic stakeholders and publishers. These changes...