The Twitter accounts of scientific journals: a dataset
Author : Andreas Nishikawa-Pacher Twitter harbours dense networks of academics, but to what extent do scientific journals use that platform? This article introd...
Étiquette : scientific communication
Perceptions regarding open science appraised by editors of scholarly publications published in Spain
Authors : Remedios Melero, Juan-José Boté-Vericad, Alexandre López-Borrull Pillars of open science are often included within the editorial policies of scholarly...
The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising
Authors : Uchendu Eugene Chigbu, Sulaiman Olusegun Atiku, Cherley C. Du Plessis The ability to conduct an explicit and robust literature review by students, sch...
Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies
Authors : Béatrice Milard, Yoann Pitarch To what extent is the destiny of a scientific paper shaped by the cocitation network in which it is involved? What are ...
Objectifs et stratégies de publication d’un bulletin de liaison : Le Médiéviste et l’Ordinateur (1979-1989)
Auteur/Author : Edgar Lejeune En 1979, un petit groupe de spécialistes d’histoire médiévale utilisateurs des ordinateurs lance une publication d’un genre nouvea...
La fonction de l’éditeur-auteur dans les éditions critiques numériques
Autrice/Author : Joana Casenave Cet article propose une étude des caractères d’auctorialité propres à l’édition critique et de l’évolution que cette auctorialit...
Whose research benefits more from Twitter? On Twitter-worthiness of communication research and its role in reinforcing disparities of the field
Authors : Chung-hong Chan, Jing Zeng, Mike S. Schäfer Twitter has become an important promotional tool for scholarly work, but individual academic publications ...