Peer Review at the Crossroads
Author : Dmitry Kochetkov Peer review has long been regarded as a cornerstone of scholarly communication, ensuring high quality and credibility of published res...
Étiquette : scientific communication
Open access journals lack image accessibility guidelines
Authors : Kaitlin Stack Whitney, Julia Perrone, Christie A. Bahlai In recent decades, there has been a move to “open” science and research. One component of ope...
Scrolling through science: how accurate is science content on TikTok
Authors : Ricardo Morais, Clara Eloïse Fernandes TikTok has become a popular platform for science communication, particularly among younger audiences, allowing ...
Can ChatGPT write better scientific titles? A comparative evaluation of human-written and AI-generated titles
Authors : Paul Sebo, Bing Nie, Ting Wang Background Large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 are increasingly used in scientific writing, yet little is known ...
Artificial intelligence in academic practices and policy discourses across ‘Big 5’ publishers
Authors : Gergely Ferenc Lendvai, Aczél Petra The present study investigates how the five largest academic publishers (Elsevier, Springer, Wiley, Taylor & ...
On the potential value conflict between scientific knowledge production and fair recognition of authorship
Authors : Gert Helgesson, William Bülow The value of scientific knowledge and fairness in distribution of academic credit are core values in research publicatio...
Author Name Disambiguation in Scholarly Research: A Bibliometric Perspective
Authors : Hesham Amin Hamdy El Shamly, Subaveerapandiyan A. The rapid expansion of scholarly publishing has amplified the long-standing challenge of author name...