Too much of a good thing? An observational study of prolific authors
Introduction Researchers’ productivity is usually measured in terms of their publication output. A minimum number of publications is required for some medical q...
Étiquette : scientific communication
A New Ranking Scheme for the Institutional Scientific Performance
We propose a new performance indicator to evaluate the productivity of research institutions by their disseminated scientific papers. The new quality measure in...
Open Access Indicators and Scholarly Communications in Latin America
This book is the result of a joint research and development project supported by UNESCO and undertaken in 2013 by UNESCO in partnership with the Public Knowledg...
Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor
Objective This study gathered information about the retraction policies of the top 200 scientific journals, ranked by impact factor. Methods Editors of the top ...
Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication
Publishing scholarly articles in traditional and newly-launched journals is a responsible task, requiring diligence from authors, reviewers, editors, and publis...
You are invited to submit…
The academic community is under great pressure to publish. This pressure is compounded by high rejection rates at many journals. A more recent trend is for some...
Les revues de sciences humaines et sociales en France: libre accès et audience
« La Commission européenne a émis le 17 juillet 2012 une recommandation en faveur du libre accès aux résultats de la recherche financée sur fonds publics. La qu...