Skip to content
InfoDoc MicroVeille
Veille dédiée aux Sciences de l'Information et des Bibliothèques // Collecting and Sharing research papers in Library and Information science ISSN 2429-3938
  • À propos
  • About
  • Partager une publication

Étiquette : scientific communication

EN

Use of Twitter in Spanish Communication Journals

Posted on 25 juillet 2018 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Victoria Tur-Viñes, Jesús Segarra-Saavedra, Tatiana Hidalgo-Marí This is an exploratory study on the Twitter profiles managed by 30 Spanish Communicat...

EN

Universalizing science: alternative indices to direct research

Posted on 23 juillet 2018 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Ari Melo Mariano, Maíra Rocha Santos Measurement is a complicated but very necessary task. Many indices have been created in an effort to define the q...

EN

Scholarly Communication Librarians’ Relationship with Research Impact Indicators: An Analysis of a National Survey of Academic Librarians in the United States

Posted on 19 juillet 2018 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors: Rachel Ann Miles, Stacy Konkiel, Sarah Sutton INTRODUCTION Academic librarians, especially in the field of scholarly communication, are often expected ...

EN

Do altmetrics assess societal impact in the same way as case studies? An empirical analysis testing the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF)

Posted on 17 juillet 2018 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild, Jonathan Adams Altmetrics have been proposed as a way to assess the societal impact of research. Although altmetrics ...

EN

Scholarship as an Open Conversation: Utilizing Open Peer Review in Information Literacy Instruction

Posted on 14 juillet 2018 by Hans Dillaerts

Author : Emily Ford This article explores the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy’s frame, Scholarship as a Conversation. This frame asserts that informatio...

EN

Case for the double-blind peer review

Posted on 6 juillet 2018 by Hans Dillaerts

Author : Lucie Tvrznikova Peer review is a process designed to produce a fair assessment of research quality prior to publication of scholarly work in a journal...

EN

Ten considerations for open peer review

Posted on 1 juillet 2018 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Birgit Schmidt, Tony Ross-Hellauer, Xenia van Edig, Elizabeth C Moylan Open peer review (OPR), as with other elements of open science and open researc...

Pagination des publications

« Previous 1 … 131 132 133 … 222 Next »

Abonnement par mail

Email subscription

Vérifiez votre boite de réception ou votre répertoire d’indésirables pour confirmer votre abonnement. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

Étiquettes

academic libraries Altmetrics article-processing charges Bibliometrics biomedical research business models case study Citation analysis copyright COVID-19 data reuse data sharing European Union France gold open access green road HSS institutional repositories Libraries OER open access open access journals open access policies open access publishing open data openness open repositories open science Peer Review Preprint research data research data management research impact Scholarly Communication scholarly journals Scholarly Publishing scientific communication scientific data scientific practices scientific pratices self-archiving state of the art UK USA wikipedia

Méta

  • Connexion
  • Flux des publications
  • Flux des commentaires
  • Site de WordPress-FR

Autres sites

Travaux en Info-Doc

Rencontres et Echanges Pro

© 2025 InfoDoc MicroVeille
Powered by WordPress | Theme: Graphy by Themegraphy