Skip to content
InfoDoc MicroVeille
Veille dédiée aux Sciences de l'Information et des Bibliothèques // Collecting and Sharing research papers in Library and Information science ISSN 2429-3938
  • À propos
  • About
  • Partager une publication

Étiquette : Peer Review

EN

The role of metrics in peer assessments

Posted on 13 octobre 2021 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors :  Liv Langfeldt, Ingvild Reymert, Dag W Aksnes Metrics on scientific publications and their citations are easily accessible and are often referred to i...

EN

Overburdening of peer reviewers: A multi-stakeholder perspective on causes and effects

Posted on 3 août 2021 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Anna Severin, Joanna Chataway Peer review of manuscripts is labour-intensive and time-consuming. Individual reviewers might feel themselves overburden...

EN

Problematizing Peer Review: Academic Librarians’ Pedagogical Approaches to Peer Review

Posted on 17 juillet 2021 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Lana Mariko Wood, Gr Keer INTRODUCTION This study is the first to consider how academic librarians’ understanding of and participation in the peer rev...

FR

Modes d’évaluation ouverte par les pairs : de la revue à la plateforme

Posted on 22 juin 2021 by Hans Dillaerts

Auteurs/Authors : Evelyne Broudoux, Madjid Ihadjadene Cet article a pour but de proposer un état de l’art des différentes formes de l’évaluation d’articles ou d...

EN

What Have We Learned from OpenReview?

Posted on 27 avril 2021 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Gang Wang, Qi Peng, Yanfeng Zhang, Mingyang Zhang Anonymous peer review is used by the great majority of computer science conferences. OpenReview is s...

EN

The Pioneering Role of Sci in Post Publication Public Peer Review (P4R)

Posted on 23 avril 2021 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Ahmad Yaman Abdin, Muhammad Jawad Nasim, Yannick Ney, Claus Jacob Scientists observe, discover, justify and eventually share their findings with the s...

EN

A Billion Dollar Donation: The Cost, and Inefficiency of, Researchers’ Time Spent on Peer Review

Posted on 12 avril 2021 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Balazs Aczel, Barnabas Szaszi, Alex Holcombe Background The amount and value of researchers’ peer review work is critical for academia and publishing....

Pagination des publications

« Previous 1 … 7 8 9 … 26 Next »

Abonnement par mail

Email subscription

Vérifiez votre boite de réception ou votre répertoire d’indésirables pour confirmer votre abonnement. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

Étiquettes

academic libraries Altmetrics article-processing charges Bibliometrics biomedical research business models case study Citation analysis copyright COVID-19 data reuse data sharing European Union France gold open access HSS institutional repositories Libraries OER open access open access journals open access policies open access publishing open data openness open repositories open science Peer Review Preprint research data research data management research impact Scholarly Communication scholarly journals Scholarly Publishing scientific communication scientific data scientific practices scientific pratices self-archiving state of the art UK United Kingdom USA wikipedia

Méta

  • Connexion
  • Flux des publications
  • Flux des commentaires
  • Site de WordPress-FR

Autres sites

Travaux en Info-Doc

Rencontres et Echanges Pro

© 2025 InfoDoc MicroVeille
Powered by WordPress | Theme: Graphy by Themegraphy