Mots-clefs: Citation analysis Afficher/masquer les discussions | Raccourcis clavier

  • Hans Dillaerts le 14 November 2012 à 1 h 17 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: Citation analysis,   

    The Citation Merit of Scientific Publications :

    « We propose a new method to assess the merit of any set of scientific papers in a given field based on the citations they receive. Given a field and a citation impact indicator, such as the mean citation or the h-index, the merit of a given set of n articles is identified with the probability that a randomly drawn set of n articles from a given pool of articles in that field has a lower citation impact according to the indicator in question. The method allows for comparisons between sets of articles of different sizes and fields. Using a dataset acquired from Thomson Scientific that contains the articles published in the periodical literature in the period 1998–2007, we show that the novel approach yields rankings of research units different from those obtained by a direct application of the mean citation or the h-index. »

    URL : http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0049156

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
  • Hans Dillaerts le 1 August 2012 à 12 h 29 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: Book Citation Index, Books, Citation analysis, Journal Citation Reports, , , , , Social Sciences and Humanities, Thomson Reuters   

    Towards a Book Publishers Citation Reports. First approach using the Book Citation Index :

    « The absence of books and book chapters in the Web of Science Citation Indexes (SCI, SSCI and A&HCI) has always been considered an important flaw but the Thomson Reuters ‘Book Citation Index’ database was finally available in October of 2010 indexing 29,618 books and 379,082 book chapters. The Book Citation Index opens a new window of opportunities for analyzing these fields from a bibliometric point of view. The main objective of this article is to analyze different impact indicators referred to the scientific publishers included in the Book Citation Index for the Social Sciences and Humanities fields during 2006-2011. This way we construct what we have called the ‘Book Publishers Citation Reports’. For this, we present a total of 19 rankings according to the different disciplines in Humanities & Arts and Social Sciences & Law with six indicators for scientific publishers »

    URL : http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7067

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
  • Hans Dillaerts le 20 April 2012 à 12 h 36 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: , Citation analysis, citation counts, country productivity, Equal credit method   

    A citation analysis of top research papers of computer science :

    « The study intends to evaluate the top papers of Computer Science as reflected in Science Direct. Moreover, it aims to find out authorship pattern, ranking of authors, ranking of country productivity, ranking of journals, and highly cited papers of Computer Science. The citations data have been collected from the quarterly list of hottest 25 research articles in the subject field of Computer Science from Science Direct database. In the present study, 20 issues of the alert service beginning from January/March 2005 to October/December 2010 containing a total number of 495 articles in Computer Science have been taken up for analysis. The study reveals that out of 495 top papers; three-authored articles are little ahead than two authored articles followed by four-authored articles and the country productivity of USA is at the top followed by UK, Taiwan, Chaina, and Canada. Moreover, it finds that European Journal of Operational Research occupies the top position followed by Computers in Human Behavior, and Pattern Recognition. »

    URL : http://hdl.handle.net/10760/16859

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
  • Hans Dillaerts le 19 April 2012 à 14 h 31 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: Citation analysis, Citation Pattern, D-Lib Magazine, ,   

    Citing patterns in Open Access journals: a study of D-Lib Magazine :

    « The purpose of this study was to investigate the pattern of citing references of research articles published in D-Lib Magazine during 2002 to 2008. A total of 4775 citations were collected from 295 articles published during 2002 to 2008. Articles classified as editorial materials, power point slides, book reviews, columns, reports and news items were not considered for the analysis. References of each article were collected and Microsoft Office Excel 2007 was used for analyses. The various analyses focus on year-wise distribution of articles and cited references, types of documents cited, country and language of cited documents, file format and domain of cited references, etc. The study shows the changing trends of research in the field of library & information science in the field of digital libraries particularly with the introduction of Internet and World Wide Web. This change can be seen in digital library research as researchers have been used digital and web resources to conduct their research. »

    URL : http://hdl.handle.net/10760/16851

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
  • Hans Dillaerts le 7 March 2012 à 18 h 03 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: Citation analysis, data publication information access and integration, , , online communities, reporting standards, science policy, Science publishing, , semantic publishing   

    Improving The Future of Research Communications and e-Scholarship :

    « The dissemination of knowledge derived from research and scholarship has a fundamental impact on the ways in which society develops and progresses, and at the same time it feeds back to improve subsequent research and scholarship. Here, as in so many other areas of human activity, the internet is changing the way things work; two decades of emergent and increasingly pervasive information technology have demonstrated the potential for far more effective scholarly communication. But the use of this technology remains limited.
    Force11 is a community of scholars, librarians, archivists, publishers and research funders that has arisen organically to help facilitate the change toward improved knowledge creation and sharing. This document highlights the findings of the Force11 workshop on the Future of Research Communication held at Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany, in August 2011: it summarizes a number of key problems facing scholarly publishing today, and presents a vision that addresses these problems, proposing concrete steps that key stakeholders can take to improve the state of scholarly publishing. »

    URL : http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2012/3445/

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
  • Hans Dillaerts le 5 May 2011 à 19 h 01 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: , , , , Citation analysis, , , Impact factors   

    L’évaluation des publications scientifiques : du facteur d’impact à l’indice de notoriété :

    « Les différentes modalités d’évaluation, « classiques » et en émergence, des publications scientifiques: les modalités traditionnelles de l’évaluation des revues : « facteur d’impact » du JCR, associé à l’évaluation individuelle du SCI (Science Citation Index)… ; mécanismes, acteurs, importance, enjeux… de l’évaluation standard de la littérature scientifique. les nouvelles modalités d’évaluation de l’impact des revues et publications : par les moteurs de recherche (Google Scholar), sur les entrepôts en Open Access (CiteBase et autres statistiques sur les archives ouvertes, revues en ligne…), les enquêtes et autres recensements disciplinaires (CNRS, Faculty of 1000) etc. ; les figures, les modalités, les enjeux, mais aussi les problèmes posés par ces nouvelles formes d’évaluation et par la généralisation de « l’indice de notoriété » comme critère dominant de l’évaluation. »

    URL : http://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/sic_00083870/fr/

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
    • Hans Dillaerts le 5 mai 2011 à 19 h 02 min Permalien | Connectez-vous pour répondre

      Summary :

      « Compared analysis of Citation indexes and Impact factors. Critical survey of the ISI resources and algorithms. Investigation of new evaluation models (CiteBase, Faculty of 1000, Google Scholar, CNRS/European Science Foundation) following the trends of Open Access in general and Open Archives in particular. »

c
Écrire un nouvel article
j
Prochain article/commentaire
k
Article/commentaire précédent
r
répondre
e
modifier
o
Afficher/masquer les commentaires
t
haut de page
l
se connecter
h
Afficher/masquer l'aide
shift + esc
Annuler