Innovations in peer review in scholarly publishing: a meta-summary
Authors : Helen Buckley Woods, Johanna Brumberg, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Stephen Pinfield, Ludo Waltman Background There are currently numerous innovations in p...
Étiquette : Stephen Pinfield
Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers
Authors : Andrea Chiarelli, Rob Johnson, Stephen Pinfield, Emma Richens Background Since 2013, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of preprint serv...
Motivations, understandings, and experiences of open‐access mega‐journal authors: Results of a large‐scale survey
Authors : Simon Wakeling, Claire Creaser, Stephen Pinfield, Jenny Fry, Valérie Spezi, Peter Willett, Monica Paramita Open‐access mega‐journals (OAMJs) are chara...
“No comment”?: A study of commenting on PLOS articles
Authors : Simon Wakeling, Peter Willett, Claire Creaser, Jenny Fry, Stephen Pinfield, Valerie Spezi, Marc Bonne, Christina Founti, Itzelle Medina Perea Article ...
The UK Scholarly Communication Licence: Attempting to Cut through the Gordian Knot of the Complexities of Funder Mandates, Publisher Embargoes and Researcher Caution in Achieving Open Access
Authors : Julie Baldwin, Stephen Pinfield Whilst take-up of open access (OA) in the UK is growing rapidly due partly to a number of funder mandates, managing th...
“Let the community decide”? The vision and reality of soundness-only peer review in open-access mega-journals
Authors : Valerie Spezi, Simon Wakeling, Stephen Pinfield, Jenny Fry, Claire Creaser, Peter Willett Purpose The purpose of this paper is to better understand th...
Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 2: Operational realities)
Authors : Simon Wakeling ,Valérie Spezi, Jenny Fry, Claire Creaser, Stephen Pinfield, Peter Willett This paper is the second of two Learned Publishing articles ...