FR

Légitimations et subversions de l’Open : pour une analyse de l’openwashing dans la publication scientifique

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Auteurs/Authors : Guillaume Silhol, Hans Dillaerts, Chérifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri

Ce texte propose un état de l’art inédit sur la notion d’openwashing dans l’espace des publications scientifiques. En s’appuyant sur les phénomènes de washing, il aborde une variété de formes de détournement des principes de l’ouverture scientifique.

À partir d’une analyse critique d’une littérature interdisciplinaire, le concept sténographique élaboré est appliqué aux plateformes numériques pour analyser de la déviance à bas bruit et à faible concernement.

L’article apporte une meilleure compréhension de la genèse de l’openwashing à la fois comme concept critique et vecteur de discours de dénonciation de la déviance et de ses évolutions. Enfin, il permet de forger une définition ancrée dans le champ de la communication scientifique ouverte, autant que de légitimer son usage pour appréhender les mécanismes complexes de ses transformations.

HAL : https://hal.science/hal-05363533v1

EN

Ethical and practical implications of AI in academic library research

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Author : Nuno Sousa

This article offers a critical and integrative review of how artificial intelligence (AI) is being incorporated into academic library systems, particularly in the context of scientific research production. Based on 29 studies, the review explores ethical practices, institutional boundaries, and epistemological challenges surrounding AI adoption.

Findings reveal that AI is reshaping scholarly workflows, such as metadata creation, information retrieval, and literature review, while also introducing unresolved ethical concerns, including data privacy, algorithmic bias, academic integrity, and diminished human agency.

The study identifies a misalignment between the rapid pace of AI implementation and the capacity of academic institutions to regulate its use responsibly. Librarians are situated at the intersection of innovation and ethical mediation, often without formal training or institutional support.

The review concludes that AI should not be viewed merely as a functional tool but as a socio-technical agent requiring ethical governance, critical AI literacy, and structural accountability across academic ecosystems.

URL : Ethical and practical implications of AI in academic library research

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352251391753

FR

Enjeux de légitimité dans la médiation scientifique : approche par les usages du livre

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Émilie Kohlmann, Aude Inaudi, Amélie Coulbaut-Lazzarini

Cet article porte sur le statut du livre à la fois dans sa dimension symbolique et fonctionnelle afin d’interroger les évolutions de la médiation scientifique et les tensions entre différentes représentations de la science et du public, dans un univers où se croise une grande diversité d’acteurs.

L’hypothèse est que pour répondre à leur objectif de reconnaissance, les acteurs de la médiation scientifique ont recours à différents éléments symboliques, dont le livre en tant que représentant d’une connaissance scientifique fiable et stabilisée. Objet-frontière, le livre permet d’articuler différents métiers et compétences de la médiation scientifique. Indirectement, il sert à asseoir la légitimité des discours et des acteurs, ainsi qu’à ouvrir sur des dispositifs dans lesquels la place du public est reconsidérée.

URL : https://lesenjeux.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/2025/dossier/06-enjeux-de-legitimite-dans-la-mediation-scientifique-approche-par-les-usages-du-livre/

FR

Saisir l’objet mouvant de la prédation dans la communication scientifique

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Auteur : Innocent Azilan

Cet article examine la prédation dans la communication scientifique comme un phénomène complexe et mouvant qui dépasse la simple dichotomie entre revues « légitime » et « prédatrices ». Je propose une analyse nuancée qui identifie trois formes principales de prédation : par opportunisme (éditeurs frauduleux exploitant le modèle des frais de publication), par immaturité (revues périphériques aux capacités éditoriales limitées), et par avidité (dérives des grands éditeurs commerciaux sous pression de croissance). Je montre que la prédation n’est pas cantonnée aux marges du système scientifique mais touche également des acteurs établis.

HAL : https://hal.science/hal-05344926v1

EN

Analyzing the citation impact of predatory journals in the health sciences

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Erin Watson, AHI, Li Zhang

Objective

Predatory journal articles do not undergo rigorous peer review and so their quality is potentially lower. Citing them disseminates the unreliable data they may contain and may undermine the integrity of science. Using citation analysis techniques, this study investigates the influence of predatory journals in the health sciences.

Methods

The twenty-six journals in the “Medical Sciences” category of a known predatory publisher were selected. The number of articles published by these journals was recorded based on the information from their websites. The “Cited References” search function in Web of Science was used to retrieve citation data for these journals.

Results

Of the 3,671 articles published in these predatory journals, 1,151 (31.4%) were cited at least once by 3,613 articles indexed in Web of Science. The number of articles that cited articles published in predatory journals increased significantly from 64 in 2014 to 665 in 2022, an increase of 10-fold in nine years. The citing articles were published by researchers from all over the world (from high-, middle-, and lower-income countries) and in the journals of traditional and open access publishers. Forty-three percent (1,560/3,613) of the citing articles were supported by research funds.

Conclusions

The content from articles published in predatory journals has infiltrated reputable health sciences journals to a substantial extent. It is crucial to develop strategies to prevent citing such articles.

URL : Analyzing the citation impact of predatory journals in the health sciences

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2025.2024

 

EN

Shifting norms in scholarly publications: trends in readability, objectivity, authorship, and AI use

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Padraig Cunningham, Padhraic Smyth, Barry Smyth

Academic and scientific publishing practices have changed significantly in recent years. This paper presents an analysis of 17 million research papers published since 2000 to explore changes in authorship and content practices. It shows a clear trend towards more authors, more references and longer abstracts.

While increased authorship has been reported elsewhere, the present analysis shows that it is pervasive across many major fields of study. We also identify a decline in author productivity which suggests that `gift’ authorship (the inclusion of authors who have not contributed significantly to a work) may be a significant factor. We further report on a tendency for authors to use more hyperbole, perhaps exaggerating their contributions to compete for the limited attention of reviewers, and often at the expense of readability.

This has been especially acute since 2023, as AI has been increasingly used across many fields of study, but particularly in fields such as Computer Science, Engineering and Business. In summary, many of these changes are causes of significant concern. Increased authorship counts and gift authorship have the potential to distort impact metrics such as field-weighted citation impact andh-index, while increased AI usage may compromise readability and objectivity.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.21725

EN

Open research data integration in universities: How data stewards adapt global policies to local contexts

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Stefan Stepanovic, Auriane Marmier, Tobias Mettler

Global research policies, often driven by political agendas rather than academic expertise, generate pressure on local entities to conform to global standards. This is particularly the case for universities seeking international relevance, which must address Open Research Data (ORD) principles.

Our study examines the strategic decisions that university boards must make in adopting ORD, and explores the developing role of data stewards as key facilitators in day-to-day data governance. Drawing on the first-hand experience of a professional data steward at a research-intensive Swiss university, we illustrate in four situations how power dynamics and knowledge gaps complicate the reconciliation of ORD ideals with local operational realities.

In response, we advocate a strategic shift to an integrated data stewardship model. We also propose strategies to empower data stewards by increasing the visibility of ORD in research projects, promoting task flexibility, reducing bureaucratic constraints, and setting realistic, incremental goals. We further recommend adapting global terminology to local contexts, harmonizing processes, and proactively promoting ORD.

Ultimately, our efforts emphasize the specificity of universities as expert organizations and complement traditional education and training initiatives. In this way, we aim to pave the way for a more effective and holistic implementation of ORD and ultimately other global policies.

URL : Open research data integration in universities: How data stewards adapt global policies to local contexts

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.70034