Analysis of predatory emails in early career academia and attempts at prevention
Author : Owen W. Tomlinson Predatory publishers—those who do not adhere to rigorous standards of academic practice such as peer review—are increasingly infiltra...
Étiquette : scientific communication
Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications
Authors : Xiang Zheng, Jiajing Chen, Erjia Yan, Chaoqun Ni Ensuring Wikipedia cites scholarly publications based on quality and relevancy without biases is crit...
Des voix plurielles dans l’écriture de la recherche : Pour une réflexivité incarnée
Auteur/Author : Philippe Hert L’approche qui est développée ici se situe entre les sciences de l’information et de la communication et les études de sciences. E...
Choices of immediate open access and the relationship to journal ranking and publish-and-read deals
Author : Lars Wenaas The role of academic journals is significant in the reward system of science, which makes their rank important for the researcher’s c...
Five ways to optimize open access uptake after a signed read and publish contract: lessons learned from the Dutch UKB consortium
Author : Arjan Schalken Consortia and publishers invest a lot of time and expertise in the negotiation process. A well-drafted read and publish contract is, how...
Open Editors: A dataset of scholarly journals’ editorial board positions
Authors : Andreas Nishikawa-Pacher, Tamara Heck, Kerstin Schoch Editormetrics analyses the role of editors of academic journals and their impact on the scientif...
Deep Impact: A Study on the Impact of Data Papers and Datasets in the Humanities and Social Sciences
Authors : Barbara McGillivray, Paola Marongiu, Nilo Pedrazzini, Marton Ribary, Mandy Wigdorowitz, Eleonora Zordan The humanities and social sciences (HSS) have ...