Peer review: still king in the digital age
« The article presents one of the main findings of an international study of 4,000 academic researchers that examined how trustworthiness is determined in the d...
Étiquette : scientific communication
How scholars implement trust in their reading, citing and publishing activities: Geographical differences
« In an increasingly digital environment, many factors influence how academic researchers decide what to read, what to cite, where to publish their work, and ho...
The “total cost of publication” in a hybrid open-access environment: Institutional approaches to funding journal article-processing charges in combination with subscriptions
« As open-access (OA) publishing funded by article-processing charges (APCs) becomes more widely accepted, academic institutions need to be aware of the “total ...
How Digital Are the Digital Humanities? An Analysis of Two Scholarly Blogging Platforms
« In this paper we compare two academic networking platforms, HASTAC and Hypotheses, to show the distinct ways in which they serve specific communities in the D...
Les modes de communication de la recherche aujourd’hui : quel rôle pour les bibliothécaires ?
« Le modèle des publications scientifiques, historiquement fondé sur l’article, semble être battu en brèche ces dernières années. Les échanges entre les cherche...
COAR Roadmap Future Directions for Repository Interoperability
« In the past few years, Open Access repositories and their associated services have become an important component of the global e-research infrastructure. Incr...
Monographs and Open Access : A report to HEFCE
« This report examines, and seeks to clarify, the range of issues that emerge when we think about the relationship between open access and monographs (including...