Case for the double-blind peer review
Author : Lucie Tvrznikova Peer review is a process designed to produce a fair assessment of research quality prior to publication of scholarly work in a journal...
Étiquette : scientific communication
Ten considerations for open peer review
Authors : Birgit Schmidt, Tony Ross-Hellauer, Xenia van Edig, Elizabeth C Moylan Open peer review (OPR), as with other elements of open science and open researc...
Communicating data: interactive infographics, scientific data and credibility
Authors : Nan Li, Dominique Brossard, Dietram A. Scheufele, Paul H. Wilson, Kathleen M. Rose Information visualization could be used to leverage the credibility...
Open Science Practices Adopted by Latin American & Caribbean Open Access Journals
Authors : Andre Appel, Ivonne Lujano, Sarita Albagli The objective of this study is to investigate how Open Science (OS) values and practices have influenced op...
Inequality in Knowledge Production: The Integration of Academic Infrastructure by Big Publishers
Authors : Alejandro Posada, George Chen This paper attempts to illustrate the implications of a simultaneous redirection of the big publishers’ business strateg...
Global Scholarly Collaboration: from Traditional Citation Practice to Direct Communication
Authors : Sergey Parinov, Victoria Antonova The development of recent research information systems allows a transformation of citations in the full text of rese...
The State of The Art in Peer Review
Author : John Tennant Scholarly communication is in a perpetual state of disruption. Within this, peer review of research articles remains an essential part of ...