Back to the roots: reimagining scientific evaluation of research without peer review
Author : Malik Sallam The peer review system, once a noble aspiration, now lags behind the accelerating demands of modern science. This opinion piece calls for ...
Étiquette : scientific communication
Data as a new research publication type: What could be the role of research libraries as service providers?
Authors : Mari Elisa Kuusniem, Susanna Nykyri This article examines the evolving role of research libraries in supporting the recognition of datasets as legitim...
Peer Review at the Crossroads
Author : Dmitry Kochetkov Peer review has long been regarded as a cornerstone of scholarly communication, ensuring high quality and credibility of published res...
Open access journals lack image accessibility guidelines
Authors : Kaitlin Stack Whitney, Julia Perrone, Christie A. Bahlai In recent decades, there has been a move to “open” science and research. One component of ope...
Scrolling through science: how accurate is science content on TikTok
Authors : Ricardo Morais, Clara Eloïse Fernandes TikTok has become a popular platform for science communication, particularly among younger audiences, allowing ...
Can ChatGPT write better scientific titles? A comparative evaluation of human-written and AI-generated titles
Authors : Paul Sebo, Bing Nie, Ting Wang Background Large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 are increasingly used in scientific writing, yet little is known ...
Artificial intelligence in academic practices and policy discourses across ‘Big 5’ publishers
Authors : Gergely Ferenc Lendvai, Aczél Petra The present study investigates how the five largest academic publishers (Elsevier, Springer, Wiley, Taylor & ...