Skip to content
InfoDoc MicroVeille
Veille dédiée aux Sciences de l'Information et des Bibliothèques // Collecting and Sharing research papers in Library and Information science ISSN 2429-3938
  • À propos
  • About
  • Partager une publication

Étiquette : research quality

EN

Peer review across borders: benefits and challenges of international review panels in research funding organizations

Posted on 7 juillet 2025 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Helen Peterson, Liisa Husu Peer review by external experts is widely recognized as a legitimate and trustworthy academic practice, essential for ensur...

EN

Academic Quality or Commercial Concern? The Role of APCs in Open-Access Communication Studies Journals

Posted on 2 mars 2025 by Hans Dillaerts

Author : Burak Ili Despite the positive effects of the open access (OA) movement on academic publishing, commercial publishers’ profit-driven policies con...

EN

Enhancing Research Methodology and Academic Publishing: A Structured Framework for Quality and Integrity

Posted on 12 décembre 2024 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Md. Jalil Piran, Nguyen H. Tran Following a brief introduction to research, research processes, research types, papers, reviews, and evaluations, this...

EN

Distinguishing articles in questionable and non-questionable journals using quantitative indicators associated with quality

Posted on 13 mai 2024 by Hans Dillaerts

Author : Dimity Stephen This study investigates the viability of distinguishing articles in questionable journals (QJs) from those in non-QJs on the basis of qu...

EN

The role of non-scientific factors vis-a-vis the quality of publications in determining their scholarly impact

Posted on 9 avril 2024 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, Leonardo Grilli In the evaluation of scientific publications’ impact, the interplay between intr...

EN

On The Peer Review Reports: Does Size Matter?

Posted on 11 mars 2024 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Abdelghani Maddi, Luis Miotti Amidst the ever-expanding realm of scientific production and the proliferation of predatory journals, the focus on peer ...

EN

Peer review’s irremediable flaws: Scientists’ perspectives on grant evaluation in Germany

Posted on 28 février 2024 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Eva Barlösius, Laura Paruschke, Axel Philipps Peer review has developed over time to become the established procedure for assessing and assuring the s...

Pagination des publications

1 2 3 Next »

Abonnement par mail

Email subscription

Vérifiez votre boite de réception ou votre répertoire d’indésirables pour confirmer votre abonnement. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

Étiquettes

academic libraries Altmetrics article-processing charges Bibliometrics biomedical research business models case study Citation analysis copyright COVID-19 data reuse data sharing European Union France gold open access green road HSS institutional repositories Libraries OER open access open access journals open access policies open access publishing open data openness open repositories open science Peer Review Preprint research data research data management research impact Scholarly Communication scholarly journals Scholarly Publishing scientific communication scientific data scientific practices scientific pratices self-archiving state of the art UK USA wikipedia

Méta

  • Connexion
  • Flux des publications
  • Flux des commentaires
  • Site de WordPress-FR

Autres sites

Travaux en Info-Doc

Rencontres et Echanges Pro

© 2025 InfoDoc MicroVeille
Powered by WordPress | Theme: Graphy by Themegraphy