Quantifying professionalism in peer review
Authors : Travis G. Gerwing, Alyssa M. Allen Gerwing, Stephanie Avery-Gomm, Chi-Yeung Choi, Jeff C. Clements, Joshua A. Rash Background The process of peer-revi...
Étiquette : Peer Review
Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science
Authors : Dietmar Wolfram, Peiling Wang, Adam Hembree, Hyoungjoo Park Open peer review (OPR), where review reports and reviewers’ identities are published along...
Innovative Strategies for Peer Review
Author : Edward Barroga Peer review is a crucial part of research and publishing. However, it remains imperfect and suffers from bias, lack of transparency, and...
Dear Reviewer 2: Go F’ Yourself
Author : David A. M. Peterson Objectives The objective of this study was to empirically test the wide belief that Reviewer #2 is a uniquely poor reviewer. Metho...
Towards a typology of edited books and conference proceedings according to the applied peer-review procedures
Author : Iva Zlodi In the last years here is an increasing need to ensure a more objective and transparent evaluation of scientific research in the Humanities a...
Who reviews for predatory journals? A study on reviewer characteristics
Authors : Anna Severin, Michaela Strinzel, Matthias Egger, Marc Domingo, Tiago Barros Background While the characteristics of scholars who publish in predatory ...
Envisioning the scientific paper of the future
Authors : Natalie M. Sopinka, Laura E. Coristine, Maria C. DeRosa, Chelsea M. Rochman, Brian L. Owens, Steven J. Cooke Consider for a moment the rate of advance...