Science rules! A qualitative study of scientists’ approaches to grant lottery
Author : Axel Philipps Using peer review to assess the validity of research proposals has always had its fair share of critics, including a more-than-fair-share...
Étiquette : Peer Review
The role of metrics in peer assessments
Authors : Liv Langfeldt, Ingvild Reymert, Dag W Aksnes Metrics on scientific publications and their citations are easily accessible and are often referred to i...
Overburdening of peer reviewers: A multi-stakeholder perspective on causes and effects
Authors : Anna Severin, Joanna Chataway Peer review of manuscripts is labour-intensive and time-consuming. Individual reviewers might feel themselves overburden...
Problematizing Peer Review: Academic Librarians’ Pedagogical Approaches to Peer Review
Authors : Lana Mariko Wood, Gr Keer INTRODUCTION This study is the first to consider how academic librarians’ understanding of and participation in the peer rev...
Modes d’évaluation ouverte par les pairs : de la revue à la plateforme
Auteurs/Authors : Evelyne Broudoux, Madjid Ihadjadene Cet article a pour but de proposer un état de l’art des différentes formes de l’évaluation d’articles ou d...
What Have We Learned from OpenReview?
Authors : Gang Wang, Qi Peng, Yanfeng Zhang, Mingyang Zhang Anonymous peer review is used by the great majority of computer science conferences. OpenReview is s...
The Pioneering Role of Sci in Post Publication Public Peer Review (P4R)
Authors : Ahmad Yaman Abdin, Muhammad Jawad Nasim, Yannick Ney, Claus Jacob Scientists observe, discover, justify and eventually share their findings with the s...