Skip to content
InfoDoc MicroVeille
Veille dédiée aux Sciences de l'Information et des Bibliothèques // Collecting and Sharing research papers in Library and Information science ISSN 2429-3938
  • À propos
  • About
  • Partager une publication

Étiquette : Peer Review

EN

Attitudes, behaviours and experiences of authors of COVID-19 preprints

Posted on 13 octobre 2022 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Narmin Rzayeva, Susana Oliveira Henriques, Stephen Pinfield, Ludo Waltman The COVID-19 pandemic caused a rise in preprinting, apparently triggered by ...

EN

Accelerated Peer Review and Paper Processing Models in Academic Publishing

Posted on 12 octobre 2022 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Yuki Yamada Some journals and publishers offer a free or paid rapid peer review service. In the latter case, such a servic...

EN

Transparency versus anonymity: which is better to eliminate bias in peer review?

Posted on 5 octobre 2022 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors: Faye Holst, Kim Eggleton, Simon Harris Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process. When conducted properly by dedicated and competen...

EN

The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review

Posted on 26 septembre 2022 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Serhii Nazarovets Publons was a peer reviewer rewards platform that aimed to recognize the contribution that academics mad...

EN

Gender diversity of research consortia contributes to funding decisions in a multi-stage grant peer-review process

Posted on 14 juin 2022 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Stefano Bianchini, Patrick Llerena, Sıla Öcalan-Öze, Emre Özel This study seeks to draw connections between the grant proposal peer-review and the gen...

EN

Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers

Posted on 17 mai 2022 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Danielle B. Rice, Ba’ Pham, Justin Presseau, Andrea C. Tricco, David Moher Background The demand for peer reviewers is often perceived as disproportio...

EN

Peer reviewers equally critique theory, method, and writing, with limited effect on the final content of accepted manuscripts

Posted on 9 avril 2022 by Hans Dillaerts

Author : Dimity Stephen The primary aims of peer review are to detect flaws and deficiencies in the design and interpretation of studies, and ensure the clarity...

Pagination des publications

« Previous 1 … 4 5 6 … 26 Next »

Abonnement par mail

Email subscription

Vérifiez votre boite de réception ou votre répertoire d’indésirables pour confirmer votre abonnement. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

Étiquettes

academic libraries Altmetrics article-processing charges Bibliometrics biomedical research business models case study Citation analysis copyright COVID-19 data reuse data sharing European Union France gold open access green road HSS institutional repositories Libraries OER open access open access journals open access policies open access publishing open data openness open repositories open science Peer Review Preprint research data research data management research impact Scholarly Communication scholarly journals Scholarly Publishing scientific communication scientific data scientific practices scientific pratices self-archiving state of the art UK USA wikipedia

Méta

  • Connexion
  • Flux des publications
  • Flux des commentaires
  • Site de WordPress-FR

Autres sites

Travaux en Info-Doc

Rencontres et Echanges Pro

© 2025 InfoDoc MicroVeille
Powered by WordPress | Theme: Graphy by Themegraphy