Skip to content
InfoDoc MicroVeille
Veille dédiée aux Sciences de l'Information et des Bibliothèques // Collecting and Sharing research papers in Library and Information science ISSN 2429-3938
  • À propos
  • About
  • Partager une publication

Étiquette : Peer Review

EN

Global Trends in Knowledge Production and the Evolving Peer Review Process

Posted on 15 janvier 2023 by Hans Dillaerts

Author : Steven Witt This essay thus seeks to provide further critique and clarity to the peer review process and the ways in which management of peer review is...

EN

Champions of Transparency in Education: What Journal Reviewers Can Do to Encourage Open Science Practices

Posted on 13 décembre 2022 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Rachel Renbarger, Jill L. Adelson, Joshua Rosenberg, Sondra M Stegenga, Olivia Lowrey, Pamela Rose Buckley, Qiyang Zhang As the field of education and...

EN

Analysing Elsevier Journal Metadata with a New Specialized Workbench inside ICSR Lab

Posted on 1 décembre 2022 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Ramadurai Petchiappan, Kristy James, Andrew Plume, Efthymios Tsakonas, Ana Marušić, Mario Malicki, Francisco Grimaldo, Bahar Mehmani In this white pap...

EN

Reading Peer Review : PLOS ONE and Institutional Change in Academia

Posted on 1 décembre 2022 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Martin Paul Eve, Cameron Neylon, Daniel Paul O’Donnell, Samuel Moore, Robert Gadie, Victoria Odeniyi, Shahina Parvin This Element describes for the fi...

EN

Attitudes, behaviours and experiences of authors of COVID-19 preprints

Posted on 13 octobre 2022 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Narmin Rzayeva, Susana Oliveira Henriques, Stephen Pinfield, Ludo Waltman The COVID-19 pandemic caused a rise in preprinting, apparently triggered by ...

EN

Accelerated Peer Review and Paper Processing Models in Academic Publishing

Posted on 12 octobre 2022 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Yuki Yamada Some journals and publishers offer a free or paid rapid peer review service. In the latter case, such a servic...

EN

Transparency versus anonymity: which is better to eliminate bias in peer review?

Posted on 5 octobre 2022 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors: Faye Holst, Kim Eggleton, Simon Harris Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process. When conducted properly by dedicated and competen...

Pagination des publications

« Previous 1 … 3 4 5 … 25 Next »

Abonnement par mail

Email subscription

Vérifiez votre boite de réception ou votre répertoire d’indésirables pour confirmer votre abonnement. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

Étiquettes

academic libraries Altmetrics article-processing charges Bibliometrics biomedical research business models case study Citation analysis copyright COVID-19 data reuse data sharing European Union France gold open access green road HSS institutional repositories Libraries OER open access open access journals open access policies open access publishing open data openness open repositories open science Peer Review Preprint research data research data management research impact Scholarly Communication scholarly journals Scholarly Publishing scientific communication scientific data scientific practices scientific pratices self-archiving state of the art UK USA wikipedia

Méta

  • Connexion
  • Flux des publications
  • Flux des commentaires
  • Site de WordPress-FR

Autres sites

Travaux en Info-Doc

Rencontres et Echanges Pro

© 2025 InfoDoc MicroVeille
Powered by WordPress | Theme: Graphy by Themegraphy