Effectiveness of Anonymization in Double-Blind Review
Authors : Claire Le Goues, Yuriy Brun, Sven Apel, Emery Berger, Sarfraz Khurshid, Yannis Smaragdakis Double-blind review relies on the authors’ ability an...
Étiquette : Peer Review
A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical science
Authors : Martin Almquist, Regula S. von Allmen, Dan Carradice, Steven J. Oosterling, Kirsty McFarlane, Bas Wijnhoven Background Peer review is important to the...
Using Peer Review to Support Development of Community Resources for Research Data Management
Authors : Heather Soyka, Amber Budden, Viv Hutchison, David Bloom, Jonah Duckles, Amy Hodge, Matthew S. Mayernik, Timothée Poisot, Shannon Rauch, Gail Steinhart...
What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?
Authors : Susan Guthrie, Ioana Ghiga, Steven Wooding Background Peer review decisions award >95% of academic medical research funding, so it is crucial to un...
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
Authors : Jonathan P. Tennant, Jonathan M. Dugan, Daniel Graziotin, Damien C. Jacques, François Waldner, Daniel Mietchen, Yehia Elkhatib, Lauren B. Collister, C...
A Proposed Currency System for Academic Peer Review Payments Using the BlockChain Technology
Author : Michael Spearpoint Peer review of scholarly papers is seen to be a critical step in the publication of high quality outputs in reputable journals. Howe...
The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics
Authors : Stefan Eriksson, Gert Helgesson This paper describes and discusses the phenomenon ‘predatory publishing’, in relation to both academic journals and bo...