What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?
Authors : Susan Guthrie, Ioana Ghiga, Steven Wooding Background Peer review decisions award >95% of academic medical research funding, so it is crucial to un...
Authors : Susan Guthrie, Ioana Ghiga, Steven Wooding Background Peer review decisions award >95% of academic medical research funding, so it is crucial to un...
Authors : Jonathan P. Tennant, Jonathan M. Dugan, Daniel Graziotin, Damien C. Jacques, François Waldner, Daniel Mietchen, Yehia Elkhatib, Lauren B. Collister, C...
Author : Michael Spearpoint Peer review of scholarly papers is seen to be a critical step in the publication of high quality outputs in reputable journals. Howe...
Authors : Stefan Eriksson, Gert Helgesson This paper describes and discusses the phenomenon ‘predatory publishing’, in relation to both academic journals and bo...
Author : Sabina Leonelli This paper reflects on the relation between international debates around data quality assessment and the diversity characterising resea...
Authors : Johannes Wilm, Afshin Sadeghi, Christoph Lange, Philipp Mayr Scholarly document creation continues to face various obstacles. Scholarly text productio...
Authors : Leif Longva, Eirik Reierth, Lars Moksness, Bård Smedsrød Peer reviewing is mandatory for scientific journals as quality control of submitted manuscrip...