The Social Structure of Consensus in Scientific Review
Authors : Misha Teplitskiy, Daniel Acuna, Aida Elamrani-Raoult, Konrad Kording, James Evans Personal connections between creators and evaluators of scientific w...
Authors : Misha Teplitskiy, Daniel Acuna, Aida Elamrani-Raoult, Konrad Kording, James Evans Personal connections between creators and evaluators of scientific w...
Authors : Valerie Spezi, Simon Wakeling, Stephen Pinfield, Jenny Fry, Claire Creaser, Peter Willett Purpose The purpose of this paper is to better understand th...
Authors : Tony Ross-Hellauer, Arvid Deppe, Birgit Schmidt Open peer review (OPR) is a cornerstone of the emergent Open Science agenda. Yet to date no large-scal...
Authors : Maciej J. Mrowinski, Piotr Fronczak, Agata Fronczak, Marcel Ausloos, Olgica Nedic With the volume of manuscripts submitted for publication growing eve...
Authors : Katherine S. Button, Liz Bal, Anna Clark, Tim Shipley The evidence that many of the findings in the published literature may be unreliable is compelli...
Author : Justin Esarey How does the structure of the peer review process, which can vary among journals, influence the quality of papers published in a journal?...
Author : Michael Spearpoint Peer review of scholarly papers is seen to be a critical step in the publication of high quality outputs in reputable journals. Howe...