Skip to content
InfoDoc MicroVeille
Veille dédiée aux Sciences de l'Information et des Bibliothèques // Collecting and Sharing research papers in Library and Information science ISSN 2429-3938
  • À propos
  • About
  • Partager une publication

Étiquette : Peer Review

EN

Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers

Posted on 16 décembre 2017 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Tony Ross-Hellauer, Arvid Deppe, Birgit Schmidt Open peer review (OPR) is a cornerstone of the emergent Open Science agenda. Yet to date no large-scal...

EN

Artificial intelligence in peer review: How can evolutionary computation support journal editors?

Posted on 6 décembre 2017 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Maciej J. Mrowinski, Piotr Fronczak, Agata Fronczak, Marcel Ausloos, Olgica Nedic With the volume of manuscripts submitted for publication growing eve...

EN

Preventing the ends from justifying the means: withholding results to address publication bias in peer-review

Posted on 23 novembre 2017 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Katherine S. Button, Liz Bal, Anna Clark, Tim Shipley The evidence that many of the findings in the published literature may be unreliable is compelli...

EN

Does Peer Review Identify the Best Papers? A Simulation Study of Editors, Reviewers, and the Scientific Publication Process

Posted on 18 octobre 2017 by Hans Dillaerts

Author : Justin Esarey How does the structure of the peer review process, which can vary among journals, influence the quality of papers published in a journal?...

EN

A Proposed Currency System for Academic Peer Review Payments Using the BlockChain Technology

Posted on 23 septembre 2017 by Hans Dillaerts

Author : Michael Spearpoint Peer review of scholarly papers is seen to be a critical step in the publication of high quality outputs in reputable journals. Howe...

EN

Effectiveness of Anonymization in Double-Blind Review

Posted on 10 septembre 2017 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Claire Le Goues, Yuriy Brun, Sven Apel, Emery Berger, Sarfraz Khurshid, Yannis Smaragdakis Double-blind review relies on the authors’ ability an...

EN

A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical science

Posted on 10 septembre 2017 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Martin Almquist, Regula S. von Allmen, Dan Carradice, Steven J. Oosterling, Kirsty McFarlane, Bas Wijnhoven Background Peer review is important to the...

Pagination des publications

« Previous 1 … 15 16 17 … 25 Next »

Abonnement par mail

Email subscription

Vérifiez votre boite de réception ou votre répertoire d’indésirables pour confirmer votre abonnement. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

Étiquettes

academic libraries Altmetrics article-processing charges Bibliometrics biomedical research business models case study Citation analysis copyright COVID-19 data reuse data sharing European Union France gold open access green road HSS institutional repositories Libraries OER open access open access journals open access policies open access publishing open data openness open repositories open science Peer Review Preprint research data research data management research impact Scholarly Communication scholarly journals Scholarly Publishing scientific communication scientific data scientific practices scientific pratices self-archiving state of the art UK USA wikipedia

Méta

  • Connexion
  • Flux des publications
  • Flux des commentaires
  • Site de WordPress-FR

Autres sites

Travaux en Info-Doc

Rencontres et Echanges Pro

© 2025 InfoDoc MicroVeille
Powered by WordPress | Theme: Graphy by Themegraphy