The F3-index. Valuing reviewers for scholarly journals
Authors : Federico Bianchi, Francisco Grimaldo, Flaminio Squazzoni This paper presents an index that measures reviewer contribution to editorial processes of sc...
Étiquette : Peer Review
What does better peer review look like? Underlying principles and recommendations for better practice
Authors : Heidi Allen, Alexandra Cury, Thomas Gaston, Chris Graf, Hannah Wakley, Michael Willis We conducted a literature review of best practice in peer review...
Using AI to solve business problems in scholarly publishing
Author: Michael Upshall Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are widely used today in many areas, and are now being introduced into scholarly publishing. This art...
Who Is (Likely) Peer-Reviewing Your Papers? A Partial Insight into the World’s Top Reviewers
Authors : Francesco Pomponi, Bernardino D’Amico, Tom Rye Scientific publishing is experiencing unprecedented growth in terms of outputs across all fields. Inevi...
Guidelines for open peer review implementation
Authors : Tony Ross-Hellauer, Edit Görögh Open peer review (OPR) is moving into the mainstream, but it is often poorly understood and surveys of researcher atti...
Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review
Authors : Samir Haffar, Fateh Bazerbachi, M. Hassan Murad Various types of bias and confounding have been described in the biomedical literature that can affect...
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
Authors : Giangiacomo Bravo, Francisco Grimaldo, Emilia López-Iñesta, Bahar Mehmani, Flaminio Squazzoni To increase transparency in science, some scholarly jour...