The limitations to our understanding of peer review
Authors : Jonathan P. Tennant, Tony Ross-Hellauer Peer review is embedded in the core of our scholarly knowledge generation systems, conferring legitimacy on re...
Étiquette : Peer Review
Open Up: A Survey on Open and Non-anonymized Peer Reviewing
Authors : Lonni Besançon, Niklas Rönnberg, Jonas Löwgren, Jonathan P. Tennant, Matthew Cooper We present a discussion and analysis regarding the benefits and li...
Acceptance rates of scholarly peer-reviewed journals: A literature survey
Author : Bo-Christer Bjórk The acceptance rate of scholarly journals is an important selection criterion for authors choosing where to submit their manuscripts....
The F3-index. Valuing reviewers for scholarly journals
Authors : Federico Bianchi, Francisco Grimaldo, Flaminio Squazzoni This paper presents an index that measures reviewer contribution to editorial processes of sc...
What does better peer review look like? Underlying principles and recommendations for better practice
Authors : Heidi Allen, Alexandra Cury, Thomas Gaston, Chris Graf, Hannah Wakley, Michael Willis We conducted a literature review of best practice in peer review...
Using AI to solve business problems in scholarly publishing
Author: Michael Upshall Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are widely used today in many areas, and are now being introduced into scholarly publishing. This art...
Who Is (Likely) Peer-Reviewing Your Papers? A Partial Insight into the World’s Top Reviewers
Authors : Francesco Pomponi, Bernardino D’Amico, Tom Rye Scientific publishing is experiencing unprecedented growth in terms of outputs across all fields. Inevi...