Who reviews for predatory journals? A study on reviewer characteristics
Authors : Anna Severin, Michaela Strinzel, Matthias Egger, Marc Domingo, Tiago Barros Background While the characteristics of scholars who publish in predatory ...
Étiquette : Peer Review
Envisioning the scientific paper of the future
Authors : Natalie M. Sopinka, Laura E. Coristine, Maria C. DeRosa, Chelsea M. Rochman, Brian L. Owens, Steven J. Cooke Consider for a moment the rate of advance...
Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals
Authors : Thomas Klebel, Stefan Reichmann, Jessica Polka, Gary McDowell, Naomi Penfold, Samantha Hindle, Tony Ross-Hellauer Clear and findable publishing polici...
How Many Papers Should Scientists Be Reviewing? An Analysis Using Verified Peer Review Reports
Authors : Vincent Raoult The current peer review system is under stress from ever increasing numbers of publications, the proliferation of open-access journals ...
Peer Review of Research Data Submissions to ScholarsArchive@OSU: How can we improve the curation of research datasets to enhance reusability?
Authors : Clara Llebot, Steven Van Tuyl Objective Best practices such as the FAIR Principles (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, Reusability) were de...
A history and development of peer-review process
Author : Jana Siladitya The paper shows the importance of peer review process in the scholarly communication system and discusses both the closed and the newly ...
Does the use of open, non-anonymous peer review in scholarly publishing introduce bias? Evidence from the F1000 post-publication open peer review publishing model
Authors : Mike Thelwall, Verena Weigert, Liz Allen, Zena Nyakoojo, Eleanor-Rose Papas This study examines whether there is any evidence of bias in two areas of ...