Science of science — Citation models and research evaluation
Author : Vincent Traag Citations in science are being studied from several perspectives, among which approaches such as scientometrics and science of science. I...
Étiquette : Peer Review
Evaluating the predictive capacity of ChatGPT for academic peer review outcomes across multiple platforms
Authors : Mike Thelwall, Abdallah Yaghi Academic peer review is at the heart of scientific quality control, yet the process is slow and time-consuming. Technolo...
Improving peer review of systematic reviews and related review types by involving librarians and information specialists as methodological peer reviewers: a randomised controlled trial
Authors : Melissa L Rethlefsen, Sara Schroter, Lex M Bouter, Jamie J Kirkham, David Moher, Ana Patricia Ayala, David Blanco, Tara J Brigham, Holly K Grossetta ...
Enhancing Research Methodology and Academic Publishing: A Structured Framework for Quality and Integrity
Authors : Md. Jalil Piran, Nguyen H. Tran Following a brief introduction to research, research processes, research types, papers, reviews, and evaluations, this...
Evaluating Research Quality with Large Language Models: An Analysis of ChatGPT’s Effectiveness with Different Settings and Inputs
Author : Mike Thelwall Evaluating the quality of academic journal articles is a time consuming but critical task for national research evaluation exercises, app...
Fundamental problems in the peer-review process and stakeholders’ perceptions of potential suggestions for improvement
Authors : Cigdem Kadaifci, Erkan Isikli, Y. Ilker Topcu Academic papers are essential for researchers to communicate their work to their peers and industry expe...
Peer Reviews of Peer Reviews: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Other Experiments
Authors : Alexander Goldberg, Ivan Stelmakh, Kyunghyun Cho, Alice Oh, Alekh Agarwal, Danielle Belgrave, Nihar B. Shah Is it possible to reliably evaluate the qu...