Science rules! A qualitative study of scientists’ approaches to grant lottery
Author : Axel Philipps Using peer review to assess the validity of research proposals has always had its fair share of critics, including a more-than-fair-share...
Auteur/autrice : Hans Dillaerts
The role of metrics in peer assessments
Authors : Liv Langfeldt, Ingvild Reymert, Dag W Aksnes Metrics on scientific publications and their citations are easily accessible and are often referred to i...
Impact and visibility of Norwegian, Finnish and Spanish journals in the fields of humanities
Authors : Elías Sanz-Casado, Daniela De Filippo, Rafael Aleixandre Benavent, Vidar Røeggen, Janne Pölönen This article analyses the impact and visibility of sch...
FAIR Forever? Accountabilities and Responsibilities in the Preservation of Research Data
Author : Amy Currie, William Kilbride Digital preservation is a fast-moving and growing community of practice of ubiquitous relevance, but in which capability i...
The renewal of the digital humanities. An overview of the transformation of professions in the humanities and social sciences
Authors : Marie-Laure Massot, Agnès Tricoche This article presents a study of the French-speaking digital humanities. It is based on the experience of two resea...
Do I-PASS for FAIR? Measuring the FAIR-ness of Research Organizations
Authors : Jacquelijn Ringersma, Margriet Miedema Given the increased use of the FAIR acronym as adjective for other contexts than data or data sets, the Dutch N...
Sharing published short academic works in institutional repositories after six months : The implementation of the article 25fa (Taverne Amendment) in the Dutch Copyright Act
Authors : Jeroen Sondervan, Arjan Schalken, Saskia Woutersen-Windhouwer The ambition of the Netherlands, laid down in the National Plan Open Science, is to achi...