Auteur/autrice : Hans Dillaerts

Catégories
EN

The role of editorial boards in shaping scholarly communication: A large-scale mapping of their composition and structure

Authors : Evangelina Becerra-Rodero, José Luis Ortega

Editorial boards play a central role in shaping scholarly communication by influencing what research is published and how disciplinary boundaries are defined. Despite their importance, large-scale, systematic evidence on their composition and structure remains limited.

This study provides a comprehensive descriptive analysis of editorial boards across major scholarly publishers, with the aim of characterizing their organizational structure and the distribution of editorial positions. Using a corpus of over 810,000 editorial positions across more than 10,000 journals from 15 publishers, we examine board size and its relationship to journal output, develop a harmonized nine-class ontology of editorial roles, and analyze gender representation, institutional sectors, and geographic distribution.

We also benchmark coverage against the Open Editors dataset, a previously released resource on editorial board composition. The results reveal stratified editorial structures dominated by operational roles, a positive association between board size and journal throughput, and a strong concentration of editors in academic institutions.

Women represent approximately one-third of identified editors, and editorial presence is concentrated in the United States and Western Europe. This study provides large-scale descriptive evidence on editorial board organization and establishes an empirical baseline for future research on editorial governance, diversity, and the distribution of influence in scholarly publishing.

URL : The role of editorial boards in shaping scholarly communication: A large-scale mapping of their composition and structure

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fasi.70108

Catégories
EN

Building internationally competitive journals for science data sharing: The evolution of three biomedical English academic journals launched in China

Authors : Huisheng Wang, Hao Cheng

Academic journals serve as the platform of scientific collaboration. As China’s contribution to world-class science is advancing at a remarkable pace, cultivating world-class English-language journals has become a national imperative issue. Taking Academician George F. Gao and the three flagship journals he founded or led—Protein & Cell (2010), China CDC Weekly (2019), and hLife (2023)—as examples, herein we trace the evolutionary trajectory of English-language periodicals in China, dissecting their evolving missions, internationalization strategies and contributions to biosafety and ethical governance to provide a reproducible roadmap for currently-emerging journals.

Through analyses of the case of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) gene-editing ethics controversy, pandemic-data-sharing protocols, and international cooperation frameworks, we highlight that journals are pivotal arenas where domestic and global scientific discourses on critical biosafety and public health issues are made.

Building internationally competitive journals for science data sharing scientific governance will serve as a critical foundation for China’s ambitions to become a scientific power and for its deeper engagement in global science and technology governance.

URL : Building internationally competitive journals for science data sharing: The evolution of three biomedical English academic journals launched in China

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsheal.2026.04.002

Catégories
EN

Research integrity and open access models: insights from Retraction Watch and OpenAlex

Author : Ben Rawlins

This study examines the relationship between research integrity and open access (OA) publishing models using data from Retraction Watch and OpenAlex. Analysing 60,608 retracted publications from 2009 to 2024, the article traces how retraction patterns have shifted alongside the expansion of OA, with gold OA surpassing closed access as the dominant modality among retracted articles by 2023.

The analysis also highlights the economic dimensions of research integrity and OA, with an estimated US$41.9 million in article processing charges (APCs) collected by publishers for research that was later retracted.

These findings raise concerns about APC‑based publishing models that directly link publisher revenue to publication volume, creating structural tensions for editorial oversight and quality control. Rather than framing OA as inherently more or less prone to integrity failures, the article argues that these challenges reflect broader incentive structures within contemporary scholarly publishing.

Addressing them will require co‑ordinated governance efforts among publishers, funders, libraries and research institutions to ensure that OA is matched by accountability, transparency and trust in scholarly research.

URL : Research integrity and open access models: insights from Retraction Watch and OpenAlex

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.763

Catégories
EN

The Rise of Diamond Open Access Journals in Earth Sciences: Past Developments, Present Tensions, and Future Pathways

Authors : Olivier Pourret, Maëlis Arnould, Thibault Duretz, James Ian Farquharson, Dasapta Erwin Irawan, Larry Syu-Heng Lai, Alice Lefebvre, Craig Magee, Marc-Alban Millet, Samantha Teplitzky, Camille Thomas, Romain Vaucher, Lauren Waszek, Mark A Wieczorek, Thomas William Wong Hearing

Over roughly the last decade, a visible, community-led Diamond Open Access (OA) ecosystem has emerged in the Earth sciences, not as a departure from tradition, but as the latest expression of a long-standing culture of open, society-supported scholarly communication.

While free-to-read, fee-free publishing initiatives have deep roots in the field, predating the Diamond terminology by decades and encompassing regional infrastructures and institutional serial publishing by geological surveys and learned societies, the period since the mid-2010s has brought a new wave of explicitly Diamond-identified, community-governed disciplinary journals that have transformed the visibility and ambition of this model. This article analyzes that transition through a field-specific lens, taking journals such as Volcanica, Seismica, Tektonika, Geomorphica, Geodynamica, Sedimentologika, Advances in Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry, Open Paleontology, Planetary Research, and Journal of Studies of Earth’s Deep Interior as emblematic of a broader shift in scholarly communication.

Building on current Diamond OA debates, we argue that Earth sciences Diamond journals are not merely “no-fee” outlets but sociotechnical experiments in reclaiming agency, redistributing publishing labor, and redefining value away from commercial metrics. This article develops three claims. First, the Earth sciences Diamond turn has been enabled by existing community infrastructures and high levels of volunteer coordination, but it remains uneven and fragile.

Second, Diamond models strengthen equity for authors and readers while exposing unresolved tensions around labor sustainability, institutional support, and recognition regimes still structured by prestige metrics. Third, Earth sciences offer a strategically important testbed for a wider transition towards commons-based scholarly communication, especially where global fieldwork, data justice, and decolonizing commitments demand alternatives to the pay-to-read and pay-to-publish systems.

We conclude that the next decade should prioritize durable funding compacts, shared technical infrastructure, and reform of research assessment so that Diamond OA can scale without reproducing extractive or technocratic governance.

URL : The Rise of Diamond Open Access Journals in Earth Sciences: Past Developments, Present Tensions, and Future Pathways

DOI : https://doi.org/10.31223/X56J5P

Catégories
EN

Sleeping beauties papers in open science: identification, characteristics, and impact

Authors : Xu Wang, Dongyang Shi, Zeeshan Muhammad, Yufei Xue, Junping Qiu

In an open scientific environment, multidimensional feature analysis and influence comparison of Sleeping Beauty papers can fully tap their potential scientific research value. This study selected management and computer science as the representative disciplines. The data sources are Web of Science (WoS) and altmetric.com, from which the study obtained a large amount of bibliographic data, citation data, and altmetrics data.

Firstly, the Sleeping Beauty papers are recognized by the K-values recognition method combined with three indicators. This study then analyzes and compares the sleep characteristics, journal distribution characteristics, awakening mechanisms, and impact of Sleeping Beauty papers across the two disciplines.

The empirical results show that. (1) computer science disciplines are more prone to producing Sleeping Beauty papers with more prominent citation features. (2) Papers published in top-tier management journals may also experience delayed recognition after years of dormancy, whearase Sleeping Beauty papers in the field of computer science often appear in low-level journals. (3)

Both disciplines focus on the innovation and value of articles in theoretical aspects, whearase the computer science discipline pays more attention to the application and improvement of previous algorithms or technologies. (4) The sleep and awakening of Sleeping Beauty papers are associated with both academic and social influences.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsim.2026.100047

Catégories
EN

(De)generative AI and research integrity

Author : Jurij Selan

The phenomenon of artificial intelligence (AI) is inherently paradoxical. On one hand, it is generative. This generative quality has benefited contemporary research by enabling researchers to generate ideas and enhance research opportunities while saving time and costs.

On the other hand, the generative nature of AI appears inevitably to lead to antagonism, resulting in entropy through model collapse and becoming degenerative. In this article, we explore the extent to which the implicitly degenerative nature of AI could be regarded as the main long-term threat to research integrity (RI), as many other problems associated with the impact of AI on RI may be seen as its effects.

In the first part, we provide an overview of the impact of AI on RI, including AI ethics, the use of AI in education (AIED), AI as a “grey area” or questionable research practice (QRP), the implementation of principles for AI use in codes of conduct, and the attitudes of academic publishers and universities towards AI. In the second part, we examine how the collapse of generative AI into degenerative AI poses a critical threat to RI in the future.

We emphasise that the only way to prevent the harmful effects of the degenerative nature of AI on RI is to retain the original human-generated datasets as the basis for AI systems and continually add new human-generated datasets.

One of the key principles regarding the impact of AI on RI is therefore the responsibility to ensure that AI remains grounded in human-created reality. This, however, leads us to the sociotechnical perspective on degenerative AI, which we address in the third part, where we evaluate the broader social and moral impact of degenerative AI.

We stress a fundamental shift in human trust requirements towards society and make a plea for more inclusive anticipatory risk management of AI with respect to RI.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-08248-y
Catégories
FR

L’archiviste et la gestion des jeux de données ouvertes de recherche en milieu universitaire canadien : une visibilité à accroître, des collaborations à développer

Autrice : Siham Alaoui

Avec le mouvement de la science ouverte militant pour un accès équitable aux résultats de la recherche scientifique, les chercheurs universitaires sont tenus de déposer leurs jeux de données de recherche sous une forme ouverte et réutilisable par un tiers. Pourvu que ces traces documentaires soient réexploitables, il importe qu’elles obéissent à des critères de qualité définies selon les principes FAIR (Findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable).

Pour ce faire, plusieurs experts, nommément les bibliothécaires universitaires, accompagnent les chercheurs dans la gestion de leurs jeux de données de recherche. D’un point de vue archivistique, les jeux de données de recherche sont des preuves des activités scientifiques, ce qui laisse entendre qu’elles devraient également être prises en charge par les archivistes universitaires.

Cependant, ces derniers sont souvent peu présents dans ce contexte et leur rôle est, dans la plupart des cas, limité à la préservation à long terme de ces données. Dans cet article, nous nous attachons à la gestion des jeux de données ouvertes de recherche d’une perspective archivistique, en conceptualisant le rôle des archivistes universitaires dans la gestion collaborative de ces traces.

En mobilisant des corpus scientifiques pertinents en sciences de l’information, nous modélisons les relations que les archivistes entretiennent avec les autres parties prenantes impliquées dans la gouvernance des données ouvertes de recherche en milieu universitaire canadien. Notre recherche contribue à l’avancement des connaissances sur le rôle de l’archiviste universitaire dans la gouvernance collaborative des données de recherche.

URL : L’archiviste et la gestion des jeux de données ouvertes de recherche en milieu universitaire canadien : une visibilité à accroître, des collaborations à développer

DOI : https://doi.org/10.34874/IMIST.PRSM/jis-v24i1.57657