A cross sectional study of retraction notices of scholarly journals of science
Authors : Manorama Tripathi, Sharad Kumar Sonkar, Sunil Kumar Retraction is the withdrawal of published article after it is found that the authors did not ensur...
Étiquette : scientific communication
Ten myths around open scholarly publishing
Authors : Jonathan P Tennant, Harry Crane, Tom Crick, Jacinto Davila, Asura Enkhbayar, Johanna Havemann, Bianca Kramer, Ryan Martin, Paola Masuz...
Sci-Hub, a challenge for academic and research libraries
Authors : Llarina González-Solar, Viviana Fernández-Marcial Sci-Hub emerged into the field of scientific communication in 2011 as a platform for free access to ...
Can Google Scholar and Mendeley help to assess the scholarly impacts of dissertations?
Authors : Kayvan Kousha, Mike Thelwall Dissertations can be the single most important scholarly outputs of junior researchers. Whilst sets of journal articles a...
Who Is (Likely) Peer-Reviewing Your Papers? A Partial Insight into the World’s Top Reviewers
Authors : Francesco Pomponi, Bernardino D’Amico, Tom Rye Scientific publishing is experiencing unprecedented growth in terms of outputs across all fields. Inevi...
Guidelines for open peer review implementation
Authors : Tony Ross-Hellauer, Edit Görögh Open peer review (OPR) is moving into the mainstream, but it is often poorly understood and surveys of researcher atti...
Production and uptake of Open Access publications involving the private sector: the case of big pharma
Authors : Afredo Yegros-Yegros, Thed van Leeuwen Over the last years Open Access has been ranked very high on science policy agenda’s both internationally as we...