EN

Implementation of Transformative Agreements at the University of Chicago Library: A Case Study

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Jessica Harris, Greg Fleming, Jennifer Hart, Adrian K. Ho, Barbara Kern,
Catherine Mardikes, Debra A. Werner

The University of Chicago Library created a working group, composed of librarians across the library, to engage in dedicated and focused work around transformative agreements, including understanding how they work and how the library should be engaging with them in a complex open access (OA) landscape.

The working group was charged with specific tasks, including determining challenges and opportunities around transformative agreements, developing criteria for determining when to use the library’s OA fund to pursue an agreement, conducting ongoing assessments of the agreements, and developing a set of recommendations to communicate this out to our wider campus community.

The group’s work included piloting several transformative agreements and establishing a rubric to evaluate these agreements. The creation of the group allowed the library to gain valuable knowledge and expertise, engage actively in new models for supporting OA, and start critical conversations on campus.

The group continues the work, with the ultimate goal of affordable OA publishing and communicating the value of OA with researchers and campus partners, as well as positioning the library as a campus leader in OA.

URL : Implementation of Transformative Agreements at the University of Chicago Library: A Case Study

DOI : https://doi.org/10.31274/jlsc.18265

EN

Understanding ORCID adoption among academic researchers

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Author : Stephen R. Porter

Just over a decade ago, the ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier) was created to provide a unique digital identifier for researchers around the world. The ORCID has proven essential in identifying individual researchers and their publications, both for bibliometric research analyses and for universities and other organizations tracking the research productivity and impact of their personnel.

Yet widespread adoption of the ORCID by individual researchers has proved elusive, with previous studies finding adoption rates ranging from 3% to 42%. Using a national survey of U.S. academic researchers at 31 research universities, we investigate why some researchers adopt an ORCID and some do not. We found an overall adoption rate of 72%, with adoptions rates ranging between academic disciplines from a low of 17% in the visual and performing arts to a high of 93% in biological and biomedical sciences.

Many academic journals require an ORCID to submit a manuscript, and this is the main reason why researchers adopt an ORCID. The top three reasons for not having an ORCID are not seeing the benefits, being far enough in the academic career to not need it, and working in an academic discipline where it is not needed.

URL : Understanding ORCID adoption among academic researchers

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-025-05300-7

EN

Which kind of research papers influence policymaking

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Author : Pablo Dorta-González

This study examines the use of evidence in policymaking by analysing a range of journal and article attributes, as well as online engagement metrics. It employs a large-scale citation analysis of nearly 150,000 articles covering diverse policy topics. The findings highlight that scholarly citations exert the strongest positive influence on policy citations.

Articles from journals with a higher citation impact and larger Mendeley readership are cited more frequently in policy documents. Other online engagements, such as news and blog mentions, also boost policy citations, while mentions on social media X have a negative effect.

The finding that highly cited and widely read papers are also frequently referenced in policy documents likely reflects the perception among policymakers that such research is more trustworthy. In contrast, papers that derive their influence primarily from social media tend to be cited less often in policy contexts.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.18889

EN

Invasion of the journal snatchers: How indexed journals are falling into questionable hands

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Authors: Alberto Martín-Martín, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar

In recent years, a substantial number of established journals have received buyout offers from obscure entities, with some journals being acquired. Despite mounting circumstantial evidence of irregular behaviour exhibited by these journals post-acquisition, comprehensive analyses on this matter are lacking. To address this gap, this article examines the practices of Oxbridge Publishing House Ltd., a company registered in the UK in 2022.

Through an analysis of publicly available documentation, it becomes apparent that this entity is part of a complex network of recently established companies. Since 2020 this network has acquired, with the help of intermediary firms, at least 36 scholarly journals originally published in countries such Spain (7), United Kingdom (7), USA (5), India (4), Turkey (4), among others.

Targeting journals indexed in prestigious scientific databases like Web of Science and Scopus, many of these journals see significant transformations upon acquisition, such as the introduction or substantial escalation of publication fees, often coupled with increases in publication volumes. This increase stems from a surge in contributions originating outside the journal’s original academic community. Their disregard for proper publishing standards is evident in their widespread use of fake DOIs or the appropriation of DOIs from unrelated documents.

Drawing parallels to the film Invasion of the Body Snatchers, we refer to journals caught in this predicament as pod journals. This type of predatory publishing practice not only contributes to over-publication but also disenfranchises legitimate academic communities and poses a threat to academic bibliodiversity.

URL : Invasion of the journal snatchers: How indexed journals are falling into questionable hands

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14766415

EN

Data Management Plans: a Resource to Shape Institutional Data Management Services

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Willeke de Haan, Veerle Van den Eynden

At KU Leuven, a university in the Flemish region of Belgium, data management plans have become an important resource to drive and shape the development of data management support, services, and training. With 8,000 researchers and 7,000 PhD students in fundamental and applied research across a comprehensive range of disciplines, KU Leuven is the largest university in Belgium.

Public research funding is provided by the federal and regional governments, mainly via the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) and via research funding allocated to universities based on excellence criteria through the Special Research Fund (BOF) and the Industrial Research Fund (IOF).

Since 2018, FWO and BOF-IOF incorporated data management into their policies, requiring researchers to submit Data Management Plans (DMPs) to their institutional research office. Since then, the number of DMPs that are developed each year has increased exponentially, from 150 in 2018 to nearly 700 per year now.

The Research Coordination Office at KU Leuven decided to review all DMPs to provide feedback to ensure high-quality plans. To manage the submission, monitoring, review, and preservation of this volume of DMPs efficiently, an online platform was developed that is integrated with the university’s research information systems.

Initially, the focus of the DMP review was on supporting the development of DMPs, as this was a new concept for researchers. The review process has significantly improved the quality of DMPs. Later, support shifted to provide advice on best practices in data management. Reviews of over 2600 DMPs provide a rich source of information to develop services and training.

Based on findings from DMP reviews, the IT department developed an interactive storage guide; ethical and legal compliance in research projects can be monitored; new data management training modules are developed; and a collection of example DMPs has been developed. In addition, the growing DMP collection is a rich source of information on researchers’ data practices, providing the baseline information to develop further services. Future plans include implementing artificial intelligence in DMP reviews to automate problem detection and exploring machine-actionable DMPs for an institutional data register.

URL : Data Management Plans: a Resource to Shape Institutional Data Management Services

DOI : https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v19.i1.1051

EN

Unequal Access, Unequal Impact? The Role of Open Access Policies in Publishing and Citation Trends Across Three Countries

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Shlomit Hadad, Daphne R. Raban, Noa Aharony

This bibliometric study investigates Open Access (OA) publication and citation trends in Austria, Israel, and Mexico from 2010 to 2020—three countries with comparable research output but differing OA infrastructures.

(1) Background: The study examines how national OA policies, funding mechanisms, and transformative agreements (TAs) shape publication and citation patterns across disciplines.

(2) Methods: Using Scopus data, the analysis focuses on four broad subject areas (health, physical, life, and social sciences), applying both three-way ANOVA and a Weighted OA Citation Impact index that adjusts citation shares based on the proportional representation of each subject area in national research output. An OA Engagement Score was also developed to assess each country’s policy and infrastructure support.

(3) Results: OA publications consistently receive more citations than closed-access ones, confirming a robust OA citation advantage. Austria leads in both OA publication volume and weighted impact, reflecting its strong policy frameworks and TA coverage. Israel, while publishing fewer OA articles, achieves high citation visibility in specific disciplines. Mexico demonstrates strengths in repositories and Diamond OA journals but lags in transformative agreements.

(4) Conclusions: National differences in OA policy maturity, infrastructure, and publishing models shape both visibility and citation impact. Structural limitations and indexing disparities may further affect how research from different regions and disciplines is represented globally, emphasizing the need for inclusive and context-sensitive frameworks for evaluating OA engagement.

URL : Unequal Access, Unequal Impact? The Role of Open Access Policies in Publishing and Citation Trends Across Three Countries

DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13020020

EN

Geographical and disciplinary coverage of open access journals: OpenAlex, Scopus, and WoS

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Abdelghani Maddi, Marion Maisonobe, Chérifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri

This study aims to compare the geographical and disciplinary coverage of OA journals in three databases: OpenAlex, Scopus and the Web of Science (WoS). We used the Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources (ROAD), provided by the ISSN International Centre, as a reference to identify OA active journals (as of May 2024). Among the 62,701 active OA journals listed in ROAD, the WoS indexes 6,157 journals, Scopus indexes 7,351, while OpenAlex indexes 34,217.

A striking observation is the presence of 24,976 OA journals exclusively in OpenAlex, whereas only 182 journals are exclusively present in the WoS and 373 in Scopus. The geographical analysis focuses on two levels: continents and countries. As for disciplinary comparison, we use the ten disciplinary levels of the ROAD database. Moreover, our findings reveal a similarity in OA journal coverage between the WoS and Scopus. However, while OpenAlex offers better inclusivity and indexing, it is not without biases.

The WoS and Scopus predictably favor journals from Europe, North America and Oceania. Although OpenAlex presents a much more balanced indexing, certain regions and countries remain relatively underrepresented. Typically, Africa is proportionally as under-represented in OpenAlex as it is in Scopus, and some emerging countries are proportionally less represented in OpenAlex than in the WoS and Scopus.

These results underscore a marked similarity in OA journal indexing between WoS and Scopus, while OpenAlex aligns more closely with the distribution observed in the ROAD database, although it also exhibits some representational biases.

URL : Geographical and disciplinary coverage of open access journals: OpenAlex, Scopus, and WoS

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320347