Archives par mot-clé : Peer Review

Data without Peer: Examples of Data Peer Review in the Earth Sciences

« Peer review of data is an important process if data is to take its place as a first class research output. Much has been written about the theoretical aspects of peer review, but not as much about the actual process … Continuer la lecture

Publié dans Non classé | Marqué avec , | Laisser un commentaire

Open Science and peer-review in the humanities

« The purpose of this paper is to consider alternatives to the traditional system of peer review. I will argue that new methods of review should be more in accordance with the principles of Open Science. Current modes of carrying out … Continuer la lecture

Publié dans Non classé | Marqué avec , , | Commentaires fermés

Exposing the predators. Methods to stop predatory journals

« The internet is greatly improving the impact of scholarly journals, but also poses new threats to their quality. Publishers have arisen that abuse the Gold Open Access model, in which the author pays a fee to get his article published, … Continuer la lecture

Publié dans Non classé | Marqué avec , , , , , , | Commentaires fermés

Why Do We Still Have Journals?

« The Web has greatly reduced the barriers to entry for new journals and other platforms for communicating scientific output, and the number of journals continues to multiply. This leaves readers and authors with the daunting cognitive challenge of navigating the … Continuer la lecture

Publié dans Non classé | Marqué avec , , , , | Commentaires fermés

Publish or Perish 2014

         

Publié dans Non classé | Marqué avec , , | Commentaires fermés

L’Avenir du contrôle par les pairs dans la…

L’Avenir du contrôle par les pairs dans la publication scientifique face au défis du libre accès : « Le sujet de notre thèse « L’Avenir du contrôle par les pairs dans la publication scientifique face aux défis du libre accès » aborde la … Continuer la lecture

Publié dans Non classé | Marqué avec , , , | Commentaires fermés

With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: the Importance of Rejection, Power, and Editors in the Practice of Scientific Publishing

« Peer review is an important element of scientific communication but deserves quantitative examination. We used data from the handling service manuscript Central for ten mid-tier ecology and evolution journals to test whether number of external reviews completed improved citation rates … Continuer la lecture

Publié dans Non classé | Marqué avec , , | Commentaires fermés

How important tasks are performed peer review …

How important tasks are performed: peer review : « The advancement of various fields of science depends on the actions of individual scientists via the peer review process. The referees’ work patterns and stochastic nature of decision making both relate to … Continuer la lecture

Publié dans Non classé | Marqué avec | Commentaires fermés

Modeling peer review an agent based approach …

Modeling peer review: an agent-based approach : « The peer review system is under severe strain. Corrections have been proposed, but experiments to determine effective measures are difficult to perform. I propose a framework in which alternatives to the current peer … Continuer la lecture

Publié dans Non classé | Marqué avec , | Commentaires fermés

Peer Reviewed Open Research Data Results of a…

Peer-Reviewed Open Research Data: Results of a Pilot : « Peer review of publications is at the core of science and primarily seen as instrument for ensuring research quality. However, it is less common to independently value the quality of the … Continuer la lecture

Publié dans Non classé | Marqué avec , , | Commentaires fermés