Mots-clefs: open access mandates Afficher/masquer les discussions | Raccourcis clavier

  • Hans Dillaerts le 1 July 2013 à 18 h 20 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: , open access mandates, , , ,   

    The Critical Role of Institutional Services in Open Access Advocacy :

    « This paper examines the development of the Open Access movement in scholarly communication, with particular attention to some of the rhetorical strategies and policy mechanisms used to promote it to scholars and scientists. Despite the majority of journal publishers’ acceptance of author self-archiving practices, and the minimal time commitment required by authors to successfully self-archive their work in disciplinary or institutional repositories, the majority of authors still by and large avoid participation. The paper reviews the strategies and arguments used for increasing author participation in open access, including the role of open access mandates. We recommend a service-oriented approach towards increasing participation in open access, rather than rhetoric that speculates on the benefits that open access will have on text/data mining innovation. In advocating for open access participation, we recommend focusing on its most universal and tangible purpose: increasing public open (gratis) access to the published results of publicly funded research. Researchers require strong institutional support to understand the copyright climate of open access self-archiving, user-friendly interfaces and useful metrics, such as repository usage statistics. We recommend that mandates and well-crafted and responsive author support services at universities will ultimately be required to ensure the growth of open access. We describe the mediated deposit service that was developed to support author self-archiving in Spectrum: Concordia University Research Repository. By comparing the number of deposits of non-thesis materials (e.g. articles and conference presentations) that were accomplished through the staff-mediated deposit service to the number of deposits that were author-initiated, we demonstrate the relative significance of this service to the growth of the repository. »

    URL : http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/8.1.84

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
  • Hans Dillaerts le 17 April 2013 à 22 h 51 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: , open access mandates, , ,   

    Recent developments in Open Access :

    « Open Access to the world’s research literature has been an obvious development since the emergence of the Internet. To everyone, it appears clear that the costs of disseminating research could drop dramatically. Yet, progress in achieving it is strangely slow. This paper explores recent developments in open access, including:
    • The recent Australian NH&MRC and ARC mandates for open access deposit in university repositories, and how universities are responding to them
    • The UK’s Finch Report, and Lord Krebs’ Committee Report
    • Recent USA and German developments
    • Gradual growth in open access journals, and the challenge for universities and their libraries of transferring reader-side fees (subscriptions) to author-side fees (publication charges)
    • The emergence of submission fees so that highly selective journals need not transfer all the costs of rejections onto successful articles
    • Fake conferences and journals which exist only to extract attendance or publication fees
    • Newer publishing models
    • The recent emergence of a third route to open access based on social networking.

    The delays in establishing an obvious developmental consequence of the Internet can largely be attributed to two factors: (a) academic apathy and inertia, and (b) publisher protection of profit margins and old business models. Neither of these can be expected to last. Of particular interest is the ‘Titanium Road’, a route to open access that is reliant on social networking. »

    URL : http://eprints.utas.edu.au/16321/

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
  • Hans Dillaerts le 29 December 2012 à 12 h 42 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: , , , open access mandates, , , , ,   

    Testing the Finch Hypothesis on Green OA Mandate Ineffectiveness :

    « We have now tested the Finch Committee’s Hypothesis that Green Open Access Mandates are ineffective in generating deposits in institutional repositories. With data from ROARMAP on institutional Green OA mandates and data from ROAR on institutional repositories, we show that deposit number and rate is significantly correlated with mandate strength (classified as 1-12): The stronger the mandate, the more the deposits. The strongest mandates generate deposit rates of 70%+ within 2 years of adoption, compared to the un-mandated deposit rate of 20%. The effect is already detectable at the national level, where the UK, which has the largest proportion of Green OA mandates, has a national OA rate of 35%, compared to the global baseline of 25%. The conclusion is that, contrary to the Finch Hypothesis, Green Open Access Mandates do have a major effect, and the stronger the mandate, the stronger the effect (the Liege ID/OA mandate, linked to research performance evaluation, being the strongest mandate model). RCUK (as well as all universities, research institutions and research funders worldwide) would be well advised to adopt the strongest Green OA mandates and to integrate institutional and funder mandates. »

    URL : http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/344687/

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
  • Hans Dillaerts le 26 November 2012 à 18 h 31 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: , , open access mandates,   

    Implementing Open Access Mandates in Europe :

    « This work highlights existing open access policies in Europe and provides an overview of publishers’ self-archiving policies. It also highlights the strategies needed to implement these policies. It provides a unique overview of national awareness of open access in 32 European countries involving all eu member states and in addition, Norway, Iceland, Croatia, Switzerland and Turkey. Moreover, it describes funder and institutional open access mandates in Europe and national strategies to introduce and implement them. An overview is provided of the repository infrastructure currently in place in European countries, including institutional and disciplinary repositories, national repository networks and national open access information portals and support networks. »

    URL : http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/univerlag/2012/oa_mandates.pdf

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
  • Hans Dillaerts le 24 October 2012 à 14 h 27 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: , , , open access mandates, ,   

    Licensing Revisited: Open Access Clauses in Practice :

    « Open access increases the visibility and use of research outputs and promises to maximize the return on our public investment in research. However, only a minority of researchers will “spontaneously” deposit their articles into an open access repository. Even with the growing number of institutional and funding agency mandates requiring the deposit of papers into the university repository, deposit rates have remained stubbornly low. As a result, the responsibility for populating repositories often falls onto the shoulders of library staff and/or repository managers. Populating repositories in this way – which involves obtaining the articles, checking the rights, and depositing articles into the repository – is time consuming and resource intensive work.

    The Confederation of Open Access Repositories (COAR), a global association of repository initiatives and networks, is promoting a new strategy for addressing some of the barriers to populating repositories, involving the use of open access archiving clauses in publisher licenses. These types of clauses are being considered by consortia and licensing agencies around the world as a way of ensuring that all the papers published by a given publisher are cleared for deposit into the institutional repository. This paper presents some use cases of open access archiving clauses, discusses the major barriers to implementing archiving language into licenses, and describes some strategies that organizations can adopt in order to include such clauses into publisher licenses. »

    URL : http://liber.library.uu.nl/index.php/lq/article/view/8055/8536

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
  • Hans Dillaerts le 3 June 2012 à 20 h 42 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: , , open access mandates   

    Public Access to Federally Funded Research: Copyright and Other Issues :

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
  • Hans Dillaerts le 30 March 2012 à 14 h 33 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: , , , open access mandates, ,   

    The effects of open access mandates on institutional repositories in the UK and Germany :

    « Purpose :
    This research project explores the effects of institutional open access mandates on institutional repositories in Higher Education Institutions in the UK and Germany. Therefore, it analyses the experiences, opinions, and expectations of institutional repository managers from both countries.

    Methodology : A thorough literature review and a questionnaire-based survey were conducted to gain background information regarding open access publishing, institutional repositories, and institutional open access mandates. Semi-structured follow-up interviews provide an in-depth insight into the views of institutional repository managers regarding the effects of institutional open access mandates. The results are presented thematically.

    Findings : There is evidence that institutional mandates do have effects on institutional repositories in different ways, e.g. on content deposited and service provision. The effects vary according to the characteristics of repositories and the approach taken by institutions. The research results also indicate that the experiences of institutions with a mandate and the expectations of institutions without one are almost identical across both the UK and Germany, although the developmental context of institutional repositories and institutional mandates in these two countries are very different.

    Impact : The findings of the dissertation are of interest for Higher Education Institutions considering the implementation of an institutional open access mandate.

    Research limitations : The research was limited in the comparative analysis of the experiences of institutional repository managers as there are almost no mandates implemented in Germany. The limited time did not allow to follow-up further questions after the
    interviews were transcribed and analysed. A study of larger scale, for example on European level, should be interesting.

    Value : The value of this dissertation is the exploration of the effects of institutional open access mandates on institutional repository services, a neglected field within the vast research about open access publishing and mandates so far. »

    URL : https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/handle/2134/9327

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
  • Hans Dillaerts le 29 November 2011 à 19 h 18 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: , open access mandates, , ,   

    A Review of Open Access Self-Archiving Mandate Policies :

    « This article reviews the history of open access (OA) policies and examines the current status of mandate policy implementations. It finds that hundreds of policies have been proposed and adopted at various organizational levels and many of them have shown a positive effect on the rate of repository content accumulation. However, it also detects policies showing little or no visible impact on repository development, and attempts to analyze the effects of different types of policies, with varied levels of success. It concludes that an open access mandate policy, by itself, will not change existing practices of scholarly self-archiving. »

    URL : http://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/portal_libraries_and_the_academy/portal_pre_print/current/articles/12.1xia.pdf

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
  • Hans Dillaerts le 8 June 2011 à 14 h 13 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: , open access mandates,   

    Open Access to Research: Changing Researcher Behavior Through University and Funder Mandates :

    « The primary target of the worldwide Open Access initiative is the 2.5 million articles published every year in the planet’s 25,000 peer-reviewed research journals across all scholarly and scientific fields. Without exception, every one of these articles is an author give-away, written, not for royalty income, but solely to be used, applied and built upon by other researchers. The optimal and inevitable solution for this give-away research is that it should be made freely accessible to all its would-be users online and not only to those whose institutions can afford subscription access to the journal in which it happens to be published. Yet this optimal and inevitable solution, already fully within the reach of the global research community for at least two decades now, has been taking a remarkably long time to be grasped. The problem is not particularly an instance of « eDemocracy » one way or the other; it is an instance of inaction because of widespread misconceptions (reminiscent of Zeno’s Paradox). The solution is for the world’s research institutions and funders to (1) extend their existing « publish or perish » mandates so as to (2) require their employees and fundees to maximize the usage and impact of the research they are employed and funded to conduct and publish by (3) depositing their final drafts in their Open Access (OA) Institutional Repositories immediately upon acceptance for publication in order to (4) make their findings freely accessible to all their potential users webwide. OA metrics can then be used to measure and reward research progress and impact; and multiple layers of links, tags, commentary and discussion can be built upon and integrated with the primary research. »

    URL : http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/22401/

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
  • Hans Dillaerts le 21 December 2010 à 18 h 20 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: , , , open access mandates   

    Gold Open Access Publishing Must Not Be Allowed to Retard the Progress of Green Open Access Self-Archiving :

    « Universal Open Access (OA) is fully within the reach of the global research community: Research institutions and funders need merely mandate (green) OA self-archiving of the final, refereed drafts of all journal articles immediately upon acceptance for publication. The money to pay for gold OA publishing will only become available if universal green OA eventually makes subscriptions unsustainable. Paying for gold OA pre-emptively today, without first having mandated green OA not only squanders scarce money, but it delays the attainment of universal OA. »

    URL : http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/21818/

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
c
Écrire un nouvel article
j
Prochain article/commentaire
k
Article/commentaire précédent
r
répondre
e
modifier
o
Afficher/masquer les commentaires
t
haut de page
l
se connecter
h
Afficher/masquer l'aide
shift + esc
Annuler