Science rules! A qualitative study of scientists’ approaches to grant lottery
Author : Axel Philipps Using peer review to assess the validity of research proposals has always had its fair share of critics, including a more-than-fair-share...
Étiquette : scientific communication
The role of metrics in peer assessments
Authors : Liv Langfeldt, Ingvild Reymert, Dag W Aksnes Metrics on scientific publications and their citations are easily accessible and are often referred to i...
Impact and visibility of Norwegian, Finnish and Spanish journals in the fields of humanities
Authors : Elías Sanz-Casado, Daniela De Filippo, Rafael Aleixandre Benavent, Vidar Røeggen, Janne Pölönen This article analyses the impact and visibility of sch...
Sharing published short academic works in institutional repositories after six months : The implementation of the article 25fa (Taverne Amendment) in the Dutch Copyright Act
Authors : Jeroen Sondervan, Arjan Schalken, Saskia Woutersen-Windhouwer The ambition of the Netherlands, laid down in the National Plan Open Science, is to achi...
The Plan S Rights Retention Strategy is an administrative and legal burden, not a sustainable open access solution
Author : Shaun Yon-Seng Khoo The Plan S Rights Retention Strategy (RRS) requires authors who are submitting to subscription journals to inform publishers that t...
A Scientific Knowledge Graph with Community Detection and Routes of Search. Testing « GRAPHYP » as a Toolkit for Resilient Upgrade of Scholarly Content
Authors : Renaud Fabre, Otmane Azeroual, Patrice Bellot, Joachim Schöpfel, Daniel Egret Unlimited change in scientific terminology challenges integrity in scien...
The UGC-CARE initiative: Indian academia’s quest for research and publishing integrity
Authors : Bhushan Patwardhan, Shubhada Nagarkar This paper discusses the reasons for emergence of predatory publications in India, engendered by mandates of hig...