Case for the double-blind peer review
Author : Lucie Tvrznikova Peer review is a process designed to produce a fair assessment of research quality prior to publication of scholarly work in a journal...
Étiquette : Peer Review
Ten considerations for open peer review
Authors : Birgit Schmidt, Tony Ross-Hellauer, Xenia van Edig, Elizabeth C Moylan Open peer review (OPR), as with other elements of open science and open researc...
The State of The Art in Peer Review
Author : John Tennant Scholarly communication is in a perpetual state of disruption. Within this, peer review of research articles remains an essential part of ...
Analysis of Peer Review Effectiveness for Academic Journals Based on Distributed Parallel System
Authors : Zong-Yuan Tan, Ning Cai, Jian Zhou A simulation model based on parallel systems is established, aiming to explore the relation between the number of s...
A Case Study for a New Peer-Review Journal on Race and Ethnicity in American Higher Education
Author : Cristobal Salinas Jr. In this exploratory case study, the interests, attitudes, and opinions of participants of the National Conference on Race and Eth...
Beyond Fact Checking: Reconsidering the Status of Truth of Published Articles
Authors : David Pontille, Didier Torny Since the 17th century, scientific knowledge has been produced through a collective process, involving specific technolog...
Peer-review under review – A statistical study on proposal ranking at ESO. Part I: the pre-meeting phase
Author : Ferdinando Patat Peer review is the most common mechanism in place for assessing requests for resources in a large variety of scientific disciplines. O...