For what it’s worth – the open peer review landscape
Purpose The purpose of this paper is twofold, first, to discuss the current and future issues around post-publication open peer review. Second, to highlight som...
Étiquette : Open peer review
Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models
Objectives To assess whether reports from reviewers recommended by authors show a bias in quality and recommendation for editorial decision, compared with revie...
Diamond open access and open peer review: An analysis of the role of copyright and librarians in the support of a shift towards open access in the legal domain
« The aim of this paper is to support initiatives that stimulate volunteer involvement in creating qualitatively good conversations about the law on the interne...
Defining and characterizing open peer review a review…
Defining and characterizing open peer review: a review of the literature : « Changes in scholarly publishing have resulted in a move toward openness. To this en...
The four pillars of scholarly publishing The future…
The four pillars of scholarly publishing: The future and a foundation : « With the rise of electronic publishing and the inherent paradigm shifts for so many ot...
Open evaluation a vision for entirely transparent post…
Open evaluation: a vision for entirely transparent post-publication peer review and rating for science : « The two major functions of a scientific publishing sy...
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review…
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy : « Peer review is fundamentally a cooperative process between scientists in a community...