For what it’s worth – the open peer review landscape
Purpose The purpose of this paper is twofold, first, to discuss the current and future issues around post-publication open peer review. Second, to highlight som...
Étiquette : Open peer review
Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models
Objectives To assess whether reports from reviewers recommended by authors show a bias in quality and recommendation for editorial decision, compared with revie...
Diamond open access and open peer review: An analysis of the role of copyright and librarians in the support of a shift towards open access in the legal domain
“The aim of this paper is to support initiatives that stimulate volunteer involvement in creating qualitatively good conversations about the law on the in...
Defining and characterizing open peer review a review…
Defining and characterizing open peer review: a review of the literature : “Changes in scholarly publishing have resulted in a move toward openness. To th...
The four pillars of scholarly publishing The future…
The four pillars of scholarly publishing: The future and a foundation : “With the rise of electronic publishing and the inherent paradigm shifts for so ma...
Open evaluation a vision for entirely transparent post…
Open evaluation: a vision for entirely transparent post-publication peer review and rating for science : “The two major functions of a scientific publishi...
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review…
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy : “Peer review is fundamentally a cooperative process between scientists in a comm...