Skip to content
InfoDoc MicroVeille
Veille dédiée aux Sciences de l'Information et des Bibliothèques // Collecting and Sharing research papers in Library and Information science ISSN 2429-3938
  • À propos
  • About
  • Partager une publication

Étiquette : Open peer review

EN

Automatically Annotating Articles Towards Opening and Reusing Transparent Peer Reviews

Posted on 8 décembre 2018 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Afshin Sadeghi, Sarven Capadisli, Johannes Wilm, Christoph Lange, Philipp Mayr An increasing number of scientific publications are created in open and...

EN

Reviewing the review process: Investigation of researchers’ opinions on different methods of peer review

Posted on 28 juillet 2018 by Hans Dillaerts

Author : Carolin Anna Rebernig Peer review is considered the gold standard of scientific publishing. Trust in the traditional system of editor – blind-reviewer ...

EN

Scholarship as an Open Conversation: Utilizing Open Peer Review in Information Literacy Instruction

Posted on 14 juillet 2018 by Hans Dillaerts

Author : Emily Ford This article explores the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy’s frame, Scholarship as a Conversation. This frame asserts that informatio...

EN

Ten considerations for open peer review

Posted on 1 juillet 2018 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Birgit Schmidt, Tony Ross-Hellauer, Xenia van Edig, Elizabeth C Moylan Open peer review (OPR), as with other elements of open science and open researc...

EN

Developing indicators on Open Access by combining evidence from diverse data sources

Posted on 9 février 2018 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Thed van Leeuwen, Ingeborg Meijer, Alfredo Yegros-Yegros, Rodrigo Costas In the last couple of years, the role of Open Access (OA) publishing has beco...

EN

Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers

Posted on 16 décembre 2017 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Tony Ross-Hellauer, Arvid Deppe, Birgit Schmidt Open peer review (OPR) is a cornerstone of the emergent Open Science agenda. Yet to date no large-scal...

EN

A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical science

Posted on 10 septembre 2017 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Martin Almquist, Regula S. von Allmen, Dan Carradice, Steven J. Oosterling, Kirsty McFarlane, Bas Wijnhoven Background Peer review is important to the...

Pagination des publications

« Previous 1 … 3 4 5 … 7 Next »

Abonnement par mail

Email subscription

Vérifiez votre boite de réception ou votre répertoire d’indésirables pour confirmer votre abonnement. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

Étiquettes

academic libraries Altmetrics article-processing charges Bibliometrics biomedical research business models case study Citation analysis copyright COVID-19 data reuse data sharing European Union France gold open access green road HSS institutional repositories Libraries OER open access open access journals open access policies open access publishing open data openness open repositories open science Peer Review Preprint research data research data management research impact Scholarly Communication scholarly journals Scholarly Publishing scientific communication scientific data scientific practices scientific pratices self-archiving state of the art UK USA wikipedia

Méta

  • Connexion
  • Flux des publications
  • Flux des commentaires
  • Site de WordPress-FR

Autres sites

Travaux en Info-Doc

Rencontres et Echanges Pro

© 2025 InfoDoc MicroVeille
Powered by WordPress | Theme: Graphy by Themegraphy