A history and development of peer-review process
Author : Jana Siladitya The paper shows the importance of peer review process in the scholarly communication system and discusses both the closed and the newly ...
Étiquette : Open peer review
Open Science in the Humanities, or: Open Humanities?
Author : Marcel Knöchelmann Open science refers to both the practices and norms of more open and transparent communication and research in scientific discipline...
Does the use of open, non-anonymous peer review in scholarly publishing introduce bias? Evidence from the F1000 post-publication open peer review publishing model
Authors : Mike Thelwall, Verena Weigert, Liz Allen, Zena Nyakoojo, Eleanor-Rose Papas This study examines whether there is any evidence of bias in two areas of ...
Pubfair: a framework for sustainable, distributed, open science publishing services
Authors : Tony Ross-Hellauer, Benedikt Fecher, Kathleen Shearer, Eloy Rodrigues Over the last thirty years, digitally-networked technologies have disrupted trad...
Open Up: A Survey on Open and Non-anonymized Peer Reviewing
Authors : Lonni Besançon, Niklas Rönnberg, Jonas Löwgren, Jonathan P. Tennant, Matthew Cooper We present a discussion and analysis regarding the benefits and li...
Guidelines for open peer review implementation
Authors : Tony Ross-Hellauer, Edit Görögh Open peer review (OPR) is moving into the mainstream, but it is often poorly understood and surveys of researcher atti...
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
Authors : Giangiacomo Bravo, Francisco Grimaldo, Emilia López-Iñesta, Bahar Mehmani, Flaminio Squazzoni To increase transparency in science, some scholarly jour...