Non classé

Open Access versus Traditional Journal Pricing Using a…

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Open Access versus Traditional Journal Pricing: Using a Simple “Platform Market” Model to Understand Which Will Win (and Which Should) :

« Economists have built a theory to understand markets in which, rather than selling directly to buyers, suppliers sell through a platform, which controls prices on both sides. The theory has been applied to understand markets ranging from telephony, to credit cards, to media. In this paper, we apply the theory to the market for scholarly journals, with the journal functioning as the platform between submitting authors and subscribing readers. Our goal is to understand the conditions under which a journal would prefer open access to traditional pricing and under which open access would be better for the scholarly community. Our new model captures much of the richness of the existing economic literature on journal pricing, and indeed adds some fresh insights, yet is simple enough to be accessible to a broad audience. »

URL : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.035

EN

Open Access Initiatives in Africa — Structure, Incentives and Disincentives

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Building open access in Africa is imperative not only for African scholars and researchers doing scientific research but also for the expansion of the global science and technology knowledgebase. This paper examines the structure of homegrown initiatives, and observes very low level of awareness prevailing in the higher educational institutions and research institutes, organizations and governments.

Increasing penetration of internet as well as growing proficiency in its use account for any evidence of OA movement in the region. The absence of interest and willingness of governments and policy makers to take a role in building the movement in the region makes any observed progress a fragmented one.

URL : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.024

EN

Diffusing scientific knowledge to innovative experts

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Communicating science to scientists works well thanks to well-defined communication structures based on both printed material in peer-reviewed publications and oral presentations, e.g. at conferences and seminars.

However, when science is communicated to practitioners, the structures become fuzzy. We are looking at how to implement Web2.0 technologies to Danish seed scientists communicating to seed consultants, agricultural advisors, and seed growers, and we are met with the challenge of securing effective knowledge diffusion to the community.

Our investigation’s focal point is on Rogers’ theoretical framework “Diffusion of Innovation” (DOI), as we look at how DOI may affect the Danish seed industry if science communication is redesigned in accordance with the framework. During our project workshop, participants recognized trends and characteristics from DOI in the Danish seed community and argued for more collaboration between scientists and practitioners.

This can be done by implementing fast-learning via online website, but it needs to be assisted by slowerpaced face-to-face learning to lessen the risk of a digital knowledge divide within the community.

URL : http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/12/01/JCOM1201%282013%29A03

Non classé

Adding Value to Electronic Theses and Dissertations in…

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Adding Value to Electronic Theses and Dissertations in Institutional Repositories :

« Part of the grey literature, electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) represent a growing segment of open, available content in institutional repositories (IR) where they contribute to the impact and ranking of their institution. More than half of all IRs listed in the Directory of Open Access Repositories contain ETDs. Most of these open access projects have similarities and common features, such as access to full text and compliance with the OAI metadata harvesting protocol. But more important are the differences, with regard to metadata, policy, access restrictions, representativeness, file format, status, quality and related services. In this paper, we investigate what can be done to improve the quality of content and service provision in an open environment, in order to increase impact, traffic and usage. Based on a review of 54 recent communications and articles on PhD theses in institutional repositories, this paper shows five ways in which institutions can add value to the deposit and dissemination of electronic theses and dissertations and describes two developments that are challenging institutional repositories. »

URL : http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march13/schopfel/03schopfel.html

EN

Using Wikipedia to Enhance the Visibility of Digitized Archival Assets

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

As an increasing number of archival repositories, libraries, and cultural institutions build significant freely accessible digital collections, archivists and digital librarians must continue to develop digital outreach strategies that reflect the nature of searching and discovery in today’s information economy.

This case study examines the use of Wikipedia by the Ball State University Libraries as an opportunity to raise the visibility of digitized historic sheet music assets made available in the university’s Digital Media Repository. By adding links to specific items in this collection to relevant, existing Wikipedia articles, Ball State successfully and efficiently expanded the user base of this collection in the Digital Media Repository by vastly enhancing the discoverability of the collection’s assets.

URL : http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march13/szajewski/03szajewski.html

Non classé

Synthèse sur les politiques institutionnelles de libre accès…

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

Synthèse sur les politiques institutionnelles de libre accès à la recherche :

« En matière d’archives ouvertes, les politiques strictement incitatives se sont avérées relativement peu efficaces (environ 15% de dépôts plein texte volontaires). Par contraste, les mandats institutionnels, dont le principe est de rendre ce dépôt plus ou moins obligatoire, permettent d’augmenter significativement la participation des chercheurs. Diverses enquêtes ont d’ailleurs montré qu’une majorité d’auteurs seraient disposés à archiver leurs travaux si un tel mandat les y contraignait. Depuis 2003, les mandats essaiment à travers le monde, particulièrement aux États-Unis, mais également en Europe, où l’Université de Liège fait désormais figure de modèle. L’Union européenne, qui via son 8e PCRD (Horizon 2020) devrait rendre obligatoire le libre accès à toute recherche qu’elle finance, recommande l’adoption de mandats à ses États membres. De son côté, le Royaume-Uni semble privilégier la voie dorée, au détriment de la voie verte, avec pour conséquence probable l’envolée des coûts de publication, à la charge des universités. En France, les mandats, défendus par le CNRS et dont l’efficacité a été reconnue et approuvée à un niveau officiel, sont encore plutôt le fait d’organismes nationaux que d’universités. L’adoption et la mise en œuvre d’une politique institutionnelle est un processus de longue haleine : pour qu’elle soit comprise et acceptée par la communauté scientifique, il faut en méditer soigneusement la formulation, l’expliquer aux chercheurs de manière à éviter tout risque d’interprétation erronée, l’accompagner par des actions de soutien et de suivi, proposer des services à valeur ajoutée en rétribution aux efforts d’auto-archivage. Il peut s’avérer stratégiquement judicieux de limiter dans un premier temps l’application du mandat à des laboratoires-relais, dont l’exemple peut avoir un effet incitatif. »

URL : http://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/sic_00794497

EN

Open access: brave new world requires bravery

Posted on by Hans Dillaerts

The year 2012 heralded significant developments in open access (OA) that impacted the relationships between the major stakeholders in scholarly publishing: researchers, funders, publishers and governments.

In the UK, the clear preference for a gold OA policy enunciated by the government-backed ‘Finch Report’ is now being implemented by the research councils. Although the policy has been modified to include green routes to OA publishing, arguments continue about the optimal route to a system of open access that can work on a global scale. Resolution of these disputes will require courage and imagination.

URL : http://insights.uksg.org/articles/10.1629/2048-7754.26.1.22/