Fabriquer des éditions. Éditer des fabriques. Reconfiguration des processus techniques éditoriaux et nouveaux modèles épistémologiques

Auteur/Author : Antoine Fauchié

Cette thèse porte sur les processus d’édition en considérant qu’ils sont constitutifs de la production du sens et qu’ils reflètent des visions du monde plurielles. Nous considérons le phénomène de fabrique d’édition comme un acte éditorial qui comprend autant la formalisation d’un texte que la constitution des outils permettant ce travail.

Les dimensions techniques de l’édition sont ainsi imbriquées, telles que la construction de procédés de fabrication et de production de formes, d’objets et d’artefacts que sont les livres, ou telles que des opérations sur le texte comme l’architecture des contenus, la structuration sémantique et la composition typographique.

Notre hypothèse est construite autour de cinq grandes thématiques, qui font chacune l’objet d’un développement conceptuel, d’un prolongement critique et de l’élaboration d’un nouveau concept. Ces analyses et ces propositions théoriques sont articulées autour d’études de cas de dispositifs et d’expérimentations.

Le parcours général de cette thèse est progressif et expérimental, partant du livre comme artefact, étudiant l’édition comme acte et comme éditorialisation, présentant le numérique comme environnement puis comme processus technique avec l’édition numérique analysée au prisme des humanités numériques, considérant les formats comme des dispositifs de modélisation du sens, et questionnant le logiciel pour conceptualiser la fabrique.

URL : https://these.quaternum.net/

PDF : Fabriquer des éditions. Éditer des fabriques. Reconfiguration des processus techniques éditoriaux et nouveaux modèles épistémologiques

New academic journals: an international overview of indexing and access models

Authors : Rosangela Rodrigues, Cristóbal Urbano, Patrícia Neubert, José Miguel Rodríguez-Gairín, Marta Somoza-Fernández

Introduction

An international analysis of academic journals newly created in the period from 2011 to 2020 according to type of publisher, place of publication, their relationship with open access, and their indexing in databases.

Studies of the issues of concentration of journal publisher ownership, uses of metrics, and access to titles reveal a changing landscape that is nevertheless still dominated by large commercial oligopolies. One notable trend is the creation of new titles in various configurations.

Method

To assess the global scenario, we analyse titles created from 2011 to 2020, focusing on indexing and access models. The methodology is multidimensional, predominantly bibliometric and quantitative. The data were collected from Crossref and other databases and processed with the resources of the Information Matrix for the Analysis of Journals.

Results

The findings confirm the expansion of the periodical publishing market, of which the academic journal market represents a small fraction (7.29%). Of thdatabases may be considered academic based on indexing in some database, most are open access, indicated by their presence in the Directory of Open Access Journals (55.21%).

The analysis of publisher type confirmed the predominance of commercial publishers (44.57%), followed by universities (30.08%). The largest proportion of the titles are in the health field, compatible with the existing distribution of fields, followed by journals in the multidisciplinary and education fields.

Conclusion

In the expansion of the publishing market, academic journals represent a small fraction of the total. The main sources of new titles in open access with no processing charges for authors are universities in countries that are not home to large commercial publishers (Indonesia, Brazil, and Spain), all with government subsidies.

URL : New academic journals: an international overview of indexing and access models

Original URL : https://informationr.net/infres/article/view/466

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47989/ir284466

How can revivals of scientific publications be explained using bibliometric methods? A case study discovering booster papers for the 1985 Physics Nobel Prize paper

Authors : Robin Haunschild, Werner Marx, Jürgen Weis

The unusual citation profile of the 1985 Physics Nobel Prize paper has been analyzed. The number of citing papers per year exhibits a maximum of 123 citations in the mid-1980s and increases to more than 200 citations about two decades later.

The publication set of the citing papers was analyzed in terms of co-authorships and research topics. The USA and (more recently) the People’s Republic of China appear prominently among the countries of the citing authors. A keyword analysis of the citing papers revealed research dealing with topological insulators as one of the major newly evolving research topics. An analysis of the co-cited papers has been performed via reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS).

The most-frequently co-cited papers (the peak papers of the RPYS spectrogram) were identified and discussed. As a result, we found two primary booster papers and three secondary booster papers that renewed the interest in the 1985 Physics Nobel Prize paper.

URL : How can revivals of scientific publications be explained using bibliometric methods? A case study discovering booster papers for the 1985 Physics Nobel Prize paper

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04906-z

Vers l’élaboration d’un système d’organisation des connaissances en allergologie : l’analyse des documents et des pratiques informationnelles des acteurs

Auteur/Author : Marcin Trzmielewski

L’objectif de cette thèse, financée par la Région Occitanie (2019-2023), est d’élaborer un système d’organisation des connaissances (SOC) pour l’Unité d’Exploration des Allergies du CHU de Montpellier, permettant de représenter et d’organiser la complexité des connaissances allergologiques.

À l’heure actuelle, un SOC, qui serait utilisé par les professionnels et chercheurs du domaine dans leurs activités de traitement et de recherche d’informations n’existe pas. Les connaissances allergologiques, produites par différents acteurs, sont abondantes et hétérogènes et se développent en parallèle de la massification des données de santé.

Pour en permettre l’accès, il est crucial d’identifier et de caractériser les connaissances utiles à l’activité quotidienne des professionnels et de les structurer dans un système d’organisation et de représentation documentaire faisant le pont entre les différentes manières de représenter les connaissances par les acteurs du domaine.

Nous proposons d’élaborer le SOC en allergologie en mobilisant une approche contextualisée qui repose d’une part sur une analyse du contexte d’usage des connaissances spécialisées, via l’étude des pratiques informationnelles des professionnels qui cherchent, produisent et mobilisent des connaissances du domaine ; et d’autre part sur une analyse d’un corpus de documents qu’ils utilisent dans leurs activités quotidiennes.

À travers notre étude, nous alimentons une réflexion épistémologique au sein des sciences de l’information et de la communication, en montrant en quoi l’analyse des pratiques informationnelles contribue à l’élaboration d’un SOC pour un domaine médical. Nous essayons également de répondre à une question méthodologique, en lien avec l’élaboration du SOC en allergologie, notamment si notre méthode d’élaboration, orientée par une approche contextualisée, permet de proposer un SOC utile pour les pratiques des acteurs du domaine.

URL : Vers l’élaboration d’un système d’organisation des connaissances en allergologie : l’analyse des documents et des pratiques informationnelles des acteurs

HAL : https://hal.science/tel-04128883

Going Open Access: The Attitudes and Actions of Scientific Journal Editors in China

Authors : Wenqi Fu, Jie Xu, Qing Fang, Jingjia Ding, Hanqing Ma

This study aims to investigate the attitudes and actions of scientific journal editors in China towards open access. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 Chinese editors from various scientific journals during September and October of 2022.

The results indicate that the editors generally possess knowledge of open access and have implemented an appropriate open access model for their respective journals. However, the Chinese-language journal editors expressed a lack of motivation to adopt open access, unless there is a reform in the mechanism of academic publishing or a policy is imposed.

On the other hand, the English-language journal editors acknowledged that they have no other choice but to adopt open access. This study helps us learn about Chinese editors’ understanding and attitudes towards open access, the current status of open access in China’s scientific journals, and the mechanisms of academic publishing in China.

URL : Going Open Access: The Attitudes and Actions of Scientific Journal Editors in China

DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/publications12010001

Emerging roles and responsibilities of libraries in support of reproducible research

Authors : Birgit Schmidt, Andrea Chiarelli, Lucia Loffreda, Jeroen Sondervan

Ensuring the reproducibility of research is a multi-stakeholder effort that comes with challenges and opportunities for individual researchers and research communities, librarians, publishers, funders and service providers. These emerge at various steps of the research process, and, in particular, at the publication stage.

Previous work by Knowledge Exchange highlighted that, while there is growing awareness among researchers, reproducible publication practices have been slow to change. Importantly, research reproducibility has not yet reached institutional agendas: this work seeks to highlight the rationale for libraries to initiate and/or step up their engagement with this topic, which we argue is well aligned with their core values and strategic priorities.

We draw on secondary analysis of data gathered by Knowledge Exchange, focusing on the literature identified as well as interviews held with librarians. We extend this through further investigation of the literature and by integrating the findings of discussions held at the 2022 LIBER conference, to provide an updated picture of how libraries engage with research reproducibility.

Libraries have a significant role in promoting responsible research practices, including transparency and reproducibility, by leveraging their connections to academic communities and collaborating with stakeholders like research funders and publishers. Our recommendations for libraries include: i) partnering with researchers to promote a research culture that values transparency and reproducibility, ii) enhancing existing research infrastructure and support; and iii) investing in raising awareness and developing skills and capacities related to these principles.

URL : Emerging roles and responsibilities of libraries in support of reproducible research

DOI : https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.14947

Open access research outputs receive more diverse citations

Authors : Chun‑Kai Huang, Cameron Neylon, Lucy Montgomery, Richard Hosking, James P. Diprose, Rebecca N. Handcock, Katie Wilson

The goal of open access is to allow more people to read and use research outputs. An observed association between highly cited research outputs and open access has been claimed as evidence of increased usage of the research, but this remains controversial. A higher citation count also does not necessarily imply wider usage such as citations by authors from more places.

A knowledge gap exists in our understanding of who gets to use open access research outputs and where users are located. Here we address this gap by examining the association between an output’s open access status and the diversity of research outputs that cite it.

By analysing large-scale bibliographic data from 2010 to 2019, we found a robust association between open access and increased diversity of citation sources by institutions, countries, subregions, regions, and fields of research, across outputs with both high and medium–low citation counts. Open access through disciplinary or institutional repositories showed a stronger effect than open access via publisher platforms.

This study adds a new perspective to our understanding of how citations can be used to explore the effects of open access. It also provides new evidence at global scale of the benefits of open access as a mechanism for widening the use of research and increasing the diversity of the communities that benefit from it.

URL : Open access research outputs receive more diverse citations

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04894-0