Peer review: still king in the digital age
« The article presents one of the main findings of an international study of 4,000 academic researchers that examined how trustworthiness is determined in the d...
« The article presents one of the main findings of an international study of 4,000 academic researchers that examined how trustworthiness is determined in the d...
« In an increasingly digital environment, many factors influence how academic researchers decide what to read, what to cite, where to publish their work, and ho...
« As open-access (OA) publishing funded by article-processing charges (APCs) becomes more widely accepted, academic institutions need to be aware of the “total ...
« This article will focus on how open access publishing may add value to a number of health and social care professionals and their work in the health services....
« In this paper we compare two academic networking platforms, HASTAC and Hypotheses, to show the distinct ways in which they serve specific communities in the D...
« We explore the statistical structure of scientific community based on multivariate analysis of publication (or other identifiable metrics) distribution in the...
« Le modèle des publications scientifiques, historiquement fondé sur l’article, semble être battu en brèche ces dernières années. Les échanges entre les cherche...