Skip to content
InfoDoc MicroVeille
Veille dédiée aux Sciences de l'Information et des Bibliothèques // Collecting and Sharing research papers in Library and Information science ISSN 2429-3938
  • À propos
  • About
  • Partager une publication
EN

Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata

Posted on 5 mars 2020 by Hans Dillaerts

Authors : Ginny Hendricks, Dominika Tkaczyk, Jennifer Lin, Patricia Feeney

This paper describes the scholarly metadata collected and made available by Crossref, as well as its importance in the scholarly research ecosystem. Containing over 106 million records and expanding at an average rate of 11% a year, Crossref’s metadata has become one of the major sources of scholarly data for publishers, authors, librarians, funders, and researchers.

The metadata set consists of 13 content types, including not only traditional types, such as journals and conference papers, but also data sets, reports, preprints, peer reviews, and grants.

The metadata is not limited to basic publication metadata, but can also include abstracts and links to full text, funding and license information, citation links, and the information about corrections, updates, retractions, etc.

This scale and breadth make Crossref a valuable source for research in scientometrics, including measuring the growth and impact of science and understanding new trends in scholarly communications. The metadata is available through a number of APIs, including REST API and OAI-PMH.

In this paper, we describe the kind of metadata that Crossref provides and how it is collected and curated. We also look at Crossref’s role in the research ecosystem and trends in metadata curation over the years, including the evolution of its citation data provision.

We summarize the research used in Crossref’s metadata and describe plans that will improve metadata quality and retrieval in the future.

URL : Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00022

Crossref, Dominika Tkaczyk, Ginny Hendricks, Jennifer Lin, Patricia Feeney, scholarly metadata, scientific communication
Hans Dillaerts
View all posts by Hans Dillaerts →

Post navigation

Older post
An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in the social sciences (2014–2017)
Newer post
International Collaboration in Open Access Publications: How Income Shapes International Collaboration

Abonnement par mail

Email subscription

Vérifiez votre boite de réception ou votre répertoire d’indésirables pour confirmer votre abonnement. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

Étiquettes

academic libraries Altmetrics article-processing charges Bibliometrics biomedical research business models case study Citation analysis copyright COVID-19 data reuse data sharing European Union France gold open access green road HSS institutional repositories Libraries OER open access open access journals open access policies open access publishing open data openness open repositories open science Peer Review Preprint research data research data management research impact Scholarly Communication scholarly journals Scholarly Publishing scientific communication scientific data scientific practices scientific pratices self-archiving state of the art UK USA wikipedia

Méta

  • Connexion
  • Flux des publications
  • Flux des commentaires
  • Site de WordPress-FR

Autres sites

Travaux en Info-Doc

Rencontres et Echanges Pro

© 2025 InfoDoc MicroVeille
Powered by WordPress | Theme: Graphy by Themegraphy