Mots-clefs: digital repository Afficher/masquer les discussions | Raccourcis clavier

  • Hans Dillaerts le 7 January 2012 à 18 h 55 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: , Archive Institutionnelle, , besoins des chercheurs, Bibliothèque universitaire de Lille1, Consultation Service, , digital repository, Entrepôt de documents, , , Lille1 Library, , , Post-publication, Postprint, pratiques des chercheurs, , Prépublication, , service de consultation, , the needs of Researchers   

    Usages, pratiques et besoins des chercheurs concernant les serveurs d’archives ouvertes :

    « Le Centre Commun de Documentation de Lille1 désire mettre en place un serveur d’archives ouvertes destiné aux chercheurs dans le but de leur permettre d’archiver de façon pérenne leurs documents scientifiques et techniques et cela en toute sérénité. Dans ce cadre-là, mon stage a consisté à réaliser une étude comparative et une recherche approfondie sur les sites d’archives ouvertes tels que HAL, OATAO, SPIRE et ORBI, et cela sous forme de rapport d’audit. J’ai ainsi essayé de distinguer les différents services (exemple : service de dépôt, service de consultation…) mis en place par les sites d’archives ouvertes, la composition de ces services en terme d’éléments structurants (exemple : divers critères de consultation, …) mais je me suis aussi placée du côté des chercheurs pour essayer de comprendre leurs pratiques actuelles en matière de dépôt, de consultation et de recherche de documents. Enfin, par l’intermédiaire d’entretiens semi-directifs, j’ai voulu savoir quels étaient leurs réels besoins en terme de services, d’architecture du site, … mais aussi de connaître leur avis et leur perception du site qu’ils utilisent actuellement. »

    « The Lille1 Library wishes to implement a open archives website for researchers in order to enable them to archive their scientific and technical documents in a lasting way. In that context, my internship was to conduct a comparative study and thorough search on Open Archives sites as HAL, OATAO, SPIRE and ORBI in a form of audit report. I tried to distinguish the different services set up by theses websites, the composition of theses services in terms of structural elements but I also place on the side of researchers in order to understand their current practices regarding filing, consulting and search documents. Finally, I wanted to know what their real needs in terms of services, website architecture,… but also their views and their perception of the site they use now. »

    URL : http://memsic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/mem_00655746/fr/

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
  • Hans Dillaerts le 16 September 2011 à 11 h 25 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: digital repository, , , , , , , ,   

    Implementing Open Access Policy: First Case Studies :

    « When implementing open access, policy pioneers and flagship institutions alike have faced considerable challenges in meeting their own aims and achieving a recognized success. Legitimate authority, sufficient resources and the right timing are crucial, but the professionals charged with implementing policy typically still need several years to accomplish significant progress. This study defines a methodological standard for evaluating the first generation of open access policies. Evaluating implementation establishes evidence, enables reflection, and may foster the emergence of a second generation of open access policies. While the study is based on a small number of cases, these case studies cover most of the pioneer institutions, present the most significant issues and offer an international overview. Each case is reconstructed individually on the basis of public documents and background information, and supported by interviews with professionals responsible for open access implementation. This article presents the highlights from each case study. The results are utilized to indicate how a second generation of policies might define open access as a key component of digital research infrastructures that provide inputs and outputs for research, teaching and learning in real time. »

    URL : http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1927772

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
  • Hans Dillaerts le 19 October 2010 à 11 h 25 min Permalien
    Mots-clefs: digital repository, , , , , , , ,   

    Implementing Open Access: Policy Case Studies :

    « Implementing open access is a tough job. Legitimate authority, sufficient resources and the right timing are crucial. Pioneers, role models and flagship institutions all have faced considerable challenges in meeting their own aims and achieving a recognized success. Professionals charged with implementing policy typically need several years to accomplish significant progress. Many institutions adopting open access policies probably need to do more, much more, if the commitment to open access is to be meaningful.
    A first generation of open access policy development and implementation is coming to a close. It is thus possible to begin evaluation. Evaluating implementation establishes evidence, enables reflection, and may foster the emergence of a second generation of open access policies.
    This study is based on a small number of cases, examining the implementation of open access around the world. Some of the pioneer institutions with open access mandates have been included, as well as some newer cases. The emergence of the new stakeholders in publishing is examined, such as digital repositories, research funders and research organisations.
    Because this is a groundbreaking study, no claim is made that the results are representative. The emphasis is on variety and on defining a methodological standard. Each case is reconstructed individually on the basis of public documents and background information, and supported by interviews with professionals responsible for open access implementation.
    Implementation is typically based on targeting researchers as authors. Indeed, the author is pivotal to any open access solution. This is the ‘tertium comparationis’ that facilitates an examination of the similarities and differences across instances in an effort to build a broader policy research agenda.
    In a final section, open access is placed in the wider context of the evolution of digital scholarship. This clarifies how published research results are destined to become a key component of digital research infrastructures that provide inputs and outputs for research, teaching and learning in real time.
    The ten cases examined in detail are:

    • Refining green open access policy: Queensland University of Technology (September 2003)
    • Refining policy to foster deposit: University of Zurich (July 2005)
    • National platform, open collection, decentralized policy: the HAL platform (June-October 2006)
    • Maximising a funder’s impact: The Wellcome Trust (October 2006)
    • Implementing open access as a digital infrastructure: UK PMC (January 2007)
    • Learning from global research infrastructure: SCOAP3 (April 2007)
    • Linking public access to open data: Howard Hughes Medical Institute (January 2008)
    • Open access to all publications, internationally: Austrian Science Fund (FWF, March 2008)
    • One policy, sixty publication strategies: Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (July 2008)
    • Open Access complements the Research Information System: The University of Pretoria (May 2009) ».

    URL : http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1685855

    Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Facebook

     
c
Écrire un nouvel article
j
Prochain article/commentaire
k
Article/commentaire précédent
r
répondre
e
modifier
o
Afficher/masquer les commentaires
t
haut de page
l
se connecter
h
Afficher/masquer l'aide
shift + esc
Annuler